| Summary: | 碩士 === 開南大學 === 商學院碩士在職專班 === 100 === This current study aims to explore how and to what extent the employment of workplace facilities and systems may influence the staff’s job satisfaction, the intervening effects produced from command safety and the right to privacy, and see how individualistic differences play a part in it.
How to achieve balance among the elevation of work efficiency, maintenance of safety and protection of human right in a correction school has for long been an issue discussed far and wide, and the motivation of this paper. Can a monitoring video facility be utilized to prevent crime? What factors shall be taken into consideration before installing such monitoring facilities and how to evaluate the influence on the staff’s job satisfaction? It is not easy to observe the phenomena of an organization and get to know about what the staffers think. Hence the study selects Chengjheng High School as a research subject, with the hope of clarifying the influence of workplace facilities and systems produces on the staff’s job satisfaction. Research results are as follows:
1. Interviewees of differing gender have a remarkable discrepancy on the approval of facilities and safety, of which males are generally higher than females. Meanwhile, differing ages have also made remarkable difference on the attitude towards facilities and safety, among which people aged between 31- 40 have an apparently lower sense of safety than those aged between 41- 50 and above 51. Differing educational backgrounds play a part in the abovementioned attitude too, as those with high school or junior college degrees have a weaker sense of safety than those with technological college, university or graduate school degrees. Differing position types also are a factor affecting their opinions on facilities and systems, as, for instance, alternative servicemen are inclined to have a higher positive opinion on facilities and systems than teaching staff do. Various position types have also led to a different attitude on safety, as for example, safety guards and alternative servicemen have a higher sense of safety than teaching staff.
2. The opinions on facilities and systems are positively correlated with safety, effects and job satisfaction, whereas the attitude toward privacy is negatively correlated with effects and job satisfaction.
3. The improvement on facilities and systems can reach the effect of increasing job satisfaction, as safety has a positive intervening effect on effects and satisfaction, and privacy exerts a negative intervening effect on the relationship between effects and satisfaction.
|
|---|
