| Summary: | 碩士 === 華梵大學 === 建築學系碩士班 === 100 === This study discusses architecture features of traditional residential houses from the perspective of regionalism. In traditional migratory society, original housing in hometowns is very likely to be copied on the new land and through different materials, technologies, climates, and social cultures, a new housing style has been developed. In “House, Form and Culture,” Rapoport mentioned, “fork tradition directly and unconsciously transform culture, its the needs and values as well as the desires, the dreams, and emotions of people, into practical form and pointed the discussion from the simplest, the most direct, and the most sincere perspective and consideration of all elements rather than from single study direction because these perspectives are mutually affected and even overlapped. The perspective of spatial practice, thus, supplements the discussion on regionalism. This paper attempts to discuss the architecture system of the professional and interdependent self-helping residential houses to look for the nature and practical contents of regional architecture.
Studies on traditional architecture in Shengkeng have focused on “elite architecture” that present master art and carpentry and these architectures have been regarded as the model of “regionalism” in Shengkeng, but this paper investigated alternative architecture system, self-helping residential houses of tea farmers in Shengkeng to address the issue of “regionalism” of alterative housing and whether elite or public architecture system shall be the regional representative.
|
|---|
