| Summary: | 碩士 === 中原大學 === 室內設計研究所 === 100 === The source for admission system in college can be divided into “selection admission” and “examination admission”, while for the “selection admission” is further categorized into the “school recommendation” and “personal application”, and due to these different sources of entry it had become the general methods for college admission. This study will conduct on how performance of students in the required courses vary from different admission source, and the target of study is based on students from 2005 to 2008 admission in Chung Yuan Christian University Interior Design major. The term result data in [theoretical courses], [design courses], and [technical courses] will be analyzed through Overall Trend, Differences and Dispersion Degree methods to comprehend whether selection admission is better than examination admission students. Alongside questionnaire survey will be conducted on selection admission students to examine results statistical analysis was consistent in before and after academic performance.
The study reviled: through Overall Trend, Differences and Dispersion Degree methods it can exclude factors in the number of students and instructor score, and acknowledge the four years learning performance in students to recognize whether there is a significant gap in learning efficiency. The analysis in [theoretical courses] reviled no significant difference in selection and examination students; [design courses] and [technical courses] reviled a better performance in selection admission students, alongside the school recommend students reviled the most excellent performance. Under [Design Courses] the Interior Design course reviled selection is better than examination admission students, and this shows selection have better ability to integrate than the examination admission students, but through the four years course, the learning performance and learning efficiency have a gradual improved trend. The qualification for selection admission students is based on [Design] and [Sketch], but the study reviled the result in [Sketch] have no significant different in selection and examination admission students. This speculate [sketch] course is based on non-still life sketching of space, although selection admission students have basic sketch ability but this have no significant advantage. Questionnaire survey analysis showed: personal application have a high degree of acknowledgement in [interior design professional qualify], [college learning methods], and [the relation between courses]. The background variables reviled no significant in [admission source] but a significant relation is in [gender].
|
|---|
