| Summary: | 碩士 === 中華大學 === 行政管理學系碩士班 === 100 === The compensation price for land expropriation is always the primary of the concern for the person whose land has been expropriated. After the modification Act of Eminent Domain in 2012, the compensation price for land expropriation will be based on the market price instead of the original 140% announced land urrent value. Methods approved by the Regulations on Market Value Assessment for Land Expropriation Compensation will help to pinpoint the price of certain range of land under the ongoing zone expropriation system. They are as followed: Firstly, the real estate appraisers could be entrusted to investigate the compensation price. Secondly, the Regulations for the Real Estate Appraisal Techniques will also be used to find out the price. Thirdly, some individual factor adjustments will be increased. The practice of the policy is an opportunity to reform the existing land expropriation compensation system, the change of the idea from relative compensation to complete compensation and the introduction of the certain range of land price assessment will make the compensation more fair and reasonable. But there will be some problems arise when a new system is adapted.
By comparing with the old system, the main purpose of the study was to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the new system’s compensation idea, ordinances, and the appraisal procedure and methods. By interviewing real estate appraisers, real estate brokers, land administration agents, government officers, and elected representatives, opinions and suggestions for the new market price based compensation system were gathered.
Results were as followed: 1. Appraisals should be made by both government officers and real estate appraisers, and the information from market price registration should be taken into account during the evaluation processes to assure the prices were all reasonable and correct. 2. In the new system, lands belonging to the public sector were evaluated with zone expropriation regulations, the evaluation of lands belonging to the private sector were then adjusted by individual factors. 3. The ratio of the professionals in the Land Evaluation Committee should be increased. 4. Regulations for the Real Estate Appraisal Techniques should be carefully reviewed before the items of evaluation standard for individual factors were established. 5. There were arguments about the process of calculating the value of land reserved for public facilities. 6. The intervening of the land owner would not only decrease the administrative efficiency, but also blur the real market price.
|
|---|
