Chinese Parasitic Gaps In Syntactic Judgment Experiments
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 語言學研究所 === 100 === Theoretical syntacticians have used informal judgments of sentence acceptability as the primary evidence concerning grammaticality in syntax. However, this method has been controversial for a long time (Myers 2009a). Recently, formal judgment experiments have t...
Main Authors: | Zi-ping Hsu, 徐子平 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | James Myers |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2012
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/39517985800911427904 |
Similar Items
-
Grammaticality and Parsability in Mandarin Syntactic Judgment Experiments
by: Yu-guang Ko, et al.
Published: (2007) -
On Preverbal Negation in Sicilian and Syntactic Parasitism
by: Jacopo Garzonio, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Against syntactic reconstruction in Romanian gapping
by: Gabriela Bîlbîie
Published: (2009-01-01) -
Split intransitivity in Japanese is syntactic: Evidence for the Unaccusative Hypothesis from sentence acceptability and truth value judgment experiments
by: Shin Fukuda
Published: (2017-09-01) -
The role of semantics in syntactic processing: eye-tracking experiments of reading chinese relative clauses
by: Lu, Tsui Ping, et al.
Published: (2010)