The Effects of Localization Movement On Mainland Policy In The Period of DDP Ruling

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 中國大陸研究所碩士班 === 99 === The DPP had replaced KMT in Taiwan’s presidential election of 2000,which is the first time of party switching after establishment of the ROC Constitution. The difference of Ideology between KMT and The DPP would change the mainland policy and cross-straits relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-En Lee, 李成恩
Other Authors: Han Wu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/61668687538165575122
Description
Summary:碩士 === 淡江大學 === 中國大陸研究所碩士班 === 99 === The DPP had replaced KMT in Taiwan’s presidential election of 2000,which is the first time of party switching after establishment of the ROC Constitution. The difference of Ideology between KMT and The DPP would change the mainland policy and cross-straits relations. As a first ruling party in Taiwan after party switching, the localization plays an important role on development process for The DPP. The main point of this paper is to research the Taiwan localization movement and mainland policy under Chen Shui-bian. Mainland policy is always not only one of the most complicated subject matter in governmental policies but also an important variable determining the future development in Taiwan. Looking at the DPP''s mainland policy formulation, in addition to consideration of the local DPP ideology, the other two sides of different ideology, the involvement of the United States and other international factors, changes in Taiwan''s ideology, domestic political and economic transformation of the type, the DPP factions factors also affect the continent in the direction of policy. In the eight years of his rule, President Chen Shui-bian has made a serial moves on the cross-strait policy. Firstly, he alleged that the "92 consensus" is "Agree to Disagree" and replaced with the "92 spirit". After that he brought up “ one side one country,’’ abolishing “National Unification Council or the Guidelines for National Unification,” the “ four imperatives and one non-issue” policy, and joining the United Nations under the name of "Taiwan”. Also allow cross-strait relations into the stagnant, loss of trust. During eight-year ruling of the DPP, relationships with the CPC has fall into deadlock, "localization" and "one China principle" is where differences between both ideology. On one hand, CPC as the "localization" as an excuse for Taiwan independence; on the other hand, the DPP is simply reject the "one-China principle". With all factors, there is no consensus of two governments, and the gap between each other has become more and more deeply.