| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 土木與防災研究所 === 99 === Taiwan, where has a limited residential area but a dense population, is located at the subtropical zone and at a fault zone. The influence of disasters is always extensive. Many significant disasters have resulted in enormous damages and threatened people’s lives. The reconstruction works have the following characteristics: time emergency, a great deal of works entering, the utility efficiency of the limited resources, and preventing from the second damages, etc. Most of the damage loss was salvaged from government finance which is a heavy burden. Besides, the arrangement and manipulation of the government fiscal budget have related regulations and limitations, which are contractive. Therefore, when an emergent disaster occurs, the issue and amount of the disaster reserve money would be discreetly examined in advance. Since the Government Procurement Act has been executed, in order to be impartial, public and economic, it is considerably regulated. Hence, if the restorative procurement is executed case by case after a disaster, the efficiency of the procurement procedures cannot conform to the anticipation of the citizenry and is always denounced.。
This research will take the summaries of the classified defects from the National Audit Office’s investigation on the execution reports of the emergent construction procurement cases in 2008 and in 2009 as the theme, so as to compare and to analyze the cases of the emergent construction procurements collected for this research. It is to confer on the cruxes of the emergent construction procurement system and to draft a corresponding strategy. In addition, this research also discusses the improvements of the emergent construction procurement system for the past years in Taipei City and New Taipei City comparing with the analyses of the cases. In addition, revised substantial suggestions for the independent checking list of the emergent construction procurement system, which combines the merits of the aforesaid cases, would be made. A suitable contractor-selecting system would be compared in this research between the Reappraisal and Encouragement for Construction Industry and the Golden Quality Award of the Public Construction. The compared results will demonstrate that the contractors, selected from the Reappraisal and Encouragement for Construction Industry, are much advantageous than those selected from the Golden Quality Award of the Public Construction in legislations, in objectives of establishment, in qualifications and limitations of the evaluation, and in construction quality, etc. Different from the Golden Quality Award of the Public Construction, which is limited to the quantities of the recommended projects and cannot be expanded, it is suggested that this system could be promoted and expanded into a database of superior contractors who would be statutory superior contractors for government use. In the future, when a disaster occurs and an emergent procurement is needed, the register could be directly referred. The specific contractors in the register would be the basis for being invited to enter bids or to negotiate prices. The substantial suggestions would be made as a public wealth for the nation.
|
|---|
