| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 建築與都市設計研究所 === 99 === This research raises questions concerned with the prescribed certainty between program and spatial configuration. Professional educations suppose that precisely, predictably, rationally programming is crucial to architecture design. While the users developed their activities and construction far beyond architect’s prefigured features is not surprisingly in Taiwan. On this account, spatial configuration tends to deviate from the elaborate setting prescribed in program. In terms of use, should contents of architectural program be specific, open, or as an encouraging catalyst?
Chapter 1 proposes research issues and method based upon research question. The aim is to reconsider to what extent uses affect space sequences, and vice versa? Two parts compose the research framework: 1. references between theories and phenomenon, 2. spatial texts reading through de-constructive method.
Chapter 2 concerns with epistemology of this research. The textual reading and play in literature and un-predictabilities of events, un-imposition of use, functions and activities, and untying the links between programs and spatial configurations of architecture consist of the main body of this research. Three characters, ambiguity multiplicity and uncertainty of space are summarized and to which spatial text reading is carried out in order to search for diversities in text.
In Chapter 3, 13 spatial text readings on city space of Taipei are undertaken and a few aspects in forms of scale in program, configuration transition, time scale, the properties of fragment, as well as supplement to space, construction, and time, of play are probed further. A design methodology is accordingly established and underlies the design demonstration implement in Chapter 4. Chungshan Soccer Stadium is analogized to the text in literature. The search for diversities of text resides at elements de-constructed and re-constructed through analysis of spatial configuration.
De-constructivism put forward frontier conception to rethink single-minded and inertia ideology, whilst the phenomenon of playing and re-writing on space itself shed light on de-constructivism. This research set up un-intentionally to mediate between the West and the Eastern, however, a supplement and extension is bringing forward.
|
|---|
