| Summary: | 碩士 === 南台科技大學 === 餐旅管理教學碩士學位班 === 99 === Abstract
The purpose of the study was to explore learning effectiveness of permeability service learning applied for Hotel and Restaurant Service Course and to understand the difference of prosocial behavior between male students and female students. Following quasi-experimental method, three classes of vocational high school thirteenth graders are from researcher’s classes. The experimental group used “Service Learning applied for Hotel and Restaurant Service Course” project teaching, while the controlled group used traditional teaching method. “Hotel and Restaurant Service Course Behavior Scale”, “Prosocial Behavior Scale”, “Affections of Hotel and Restaurant Service Course” and “Service Learning Experience Scale” were used as instruments to collect data. The experimental period lasted for ten weeks, and participants were pre-tested in the fifth week and were post-tested in the tenth week. T-test, one-way ANOVA , Pearson product-moment correlation, Stepwise multiple Regression. Procedure were used to analyze the data. Results were as follows:
1. Students’ value of “Hotel and Restaurant Service Course Behavior Scale”, “Prosocial Behavior Scale”, “Affections of Hotel and Restaurant Service Course” and “Service Learning Experience Scale” were above the mean.
2. Female students’ Hotel and Restaurant Service Course Behavior in the experimental group was significantly superior to that of the control group.
3. Male students’ Prosocial Behavior in the experimental group was significantly superior to that of the control group.
4. A positive correlation exits among students’ Hotel and Restaurant Service Course Behavior ”, “Prosocial Behavior”, “Affections of Hotel and Restaurant Service Course” and “Service Learning Experience.”
5. Male students’ Hotel and Restaurant Service Course Behavior ” and “Prosocial Behavior” may explain the affections of Hotel and Restaurant Service Course and Service Learning Experiences.
6. Female students’ Hotel and Restaurant Service Course Behavior ” and “Prosocial Behavior” may explain the affections of Hotel and Restaurant Service Course and Service Learning Experiences.
7.Students in the experimental group was significantly superior to that of the control group in Hotel and Restaurant Service Course and Prosocial Behavior.
8. Students’ prosocial behavior in the first experimental group was significantly different between pretest and posttest.
9. Students’ hotel and restaurant service course behavior in the second experimental group was significantly different between pretest and posttest
10. Students’ prosocial behavior in the first experimental group was significantly different while participating children’s home service learning.
11. Students’ hotel and restaurant service course behavior in the second experimental group was significantly different while participating old folks’ home service learning.
According to the results and limitation of the study, some recommendation to research and practical suggestion were provided
Keywords: Hotel and Restaurant Service, Service Learning, Prosocial Behavior
|
|---|
