The Comparison of Anticipation Ability of Jump Spike Serve Among Volleyball Athletes with Different Skill Levels and Perception Training

• Main Authors: Chia-Chung Ma, 馬佳忠
• Other Authors: Ching-Ho Lin
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2011
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/63706794458800873746

碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 體育學系運動教練碩博士班 === 99 === Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) The proformance of pre-cue in different service timing which different skill level players did when jump serve; (2) how to anticipate different skill level players jump serve.in different service timing; (3) The influence of different perceptive trainings to anticipate jump serve. Totally 48 different skill level male volleyball players as subjects, divided into elite level ( age: 20.7±1.50, number of year that playing volleyball 8.8±2.32, height 175.3±.50cm, body weight 71.0±8.05kg ), the middle level ( age:19.0±1.50, number of year that playing volleyball 2.2±.92, height 173.3±4.46cm, weight 68.3±12.16kg ), separating into 4 groups: I Experts Training, II Experts Controlling, III Normal Training, and IV Normal Controlling.The subjects’ jumping serve motive were recorded by using time masking method from the front, and were edited into tests with scenes of 50ms,and 20ms before hit, hit ball, and 20ms after hitting ball. Each scenesstoped for 3 seconds. After 3 weeks different perceptive trains ( 3 times a week )., and letting the subjects to judge the position of landing. The data collected were analysied by SPSS, with 3-way ANOVA and 2-way ANOVA, the significance level was set at α＝.05. This study conclucted that: (1) The anticipation to jump serve of volleyball players with better skill levels were better than normal players. (2) Perceptive trainings showed no significant influence on players’ anticipation to jump serve. (3) The pre-cue ability at different serve timeing were significantly related to anticipation;which means, the longer the time was from serving, the ability to anticipate was lower, and the pre-cues for anticipation were fewer (50ms<20ms<hit). But it will be affect the accuracy of anticipation when ball has been serve to the direction of different reciving positions(position 6 or position 1) (4) No significant difference was shown between two groups on the pre-cue availability.