| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班 === 99 === The subjects of this study are the Hakka associations and public sectors in Taichung City before its upgrading date of Dec. 25th in 2010. Through the cases in the Taichung Hakka Cultural Festival from 2006 to 2010 and the analyses of the Public-Private Partnership and literature review, accompanied with the comprehensive interviews, this paper is to examine how the concept of partnership between the public and private sectors are worked in the promotion and implementation of Hakka public affairs.
The results are listed as below. First, the common goal should be clear and comprehensive in order to integrate all the policies and decisions so as to attain the goal of sustainable development. Second, the co-participation and communication of different departments should be emphasized, thereby reinforcing the public’s commitment, participation, and willingness for the public affairs; the goal is also to build a harmonious and interactive relation between public and private sectors. Third, the mechanism of integrating various resources should be established so as to integrate the community industries and resources and make the funding and its application even. Fourth, try to simplify the administrative procedures, enhance the cultivation of professional talents, and consolidate the tie and interaction between different departments.
The research direction in the future: First, the range of the research should be expanded to the whole Taichung City and the Hakka public affairs from the perspective of cross-sectors should be explicitly examined. Second, research subjects should be expanded as well. Since a lot of Hakka cultures and industries haven’t been researched yet, we suggest the researchers should probe deeper into these areas in the near future. Third, the research method should be upgraded. We hope to examine different types of Hakka public affairs that existed in different period of time and see the effectiveness of the promotion of those affairs. The quantitative method should be added in order to improve validity and objectivity.
|
|---|
