Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 圖書資訊學研究所 === 99 === University libraries play an important role in universities not only in terms of information resources and services but facilitation and support on research. Therefore, the operational performance becomes an essential consideration in university libraries....
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2011
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49716648065174623943 |
id |
ndltd-TW-099NTNU5447038 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-099NTNU54470382015-10-19T04:03:41Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49716648065174623943 Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan 大學圖書館績效評估指標之研究 Yi-Syuan Wang 王怡璇 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 圖書資訊學研究所 99 University libraries play an important role in universities not only in terms of information resources and services but facilitation and support on research. Therefore, the operational performance becomes an essential consideration in university libraries. However, lacking standardized and universal guidelines make the practical implementation of performance evaluation hard to achieve. This study aims to analyze and develop a set of feasible and suitable performance indicators for university libraries in Taiwan. The study was comprised of two stages: the indicator construction stage included primary literature review based on the existing library performance standard ISO 11620 and related research. The process of exploring the indicators of the performance measurement for university libraries was designed by Delphi method. The Delphi panel was composed of 21 professional library administers. The study was ended by all the participants reaching consensus and stability towards applicable performance indicators through three rounds of questionnaire survey. The research results were showed as follows. First, tools and models of performance measurement vary in different university libraries due to various purposes and needs. Second, accomplishing overall operational performance measurement still has its difficulties and limitations. Third, four referable dimensions of performance measurement are “Resources & Infrastructure,” “Use,” “Efficiency,” and “Potentials & Development.” Ultimately, the study concludes 27 key performance indicators. Suggestions are provided for practical applications and future research. The study provides an applicable set of performance indicators, and it is expected to be a significant reference for university libraries. Hao-Ren Ke 柯皓仁 2011 學位論文 ; thesis 181 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 圖書資訊學研究所 === 99 === University libraries play an important role in universities not only in terms of information resources and services but facilitation and support on research. Therefore, the operational performance becomes an essential consideration in university libraries. However, lacking standardized and universal guidelines make the practical implementation of performance evaluation hard to achieve. This study aims to analyze and develop a set of feasible and suitable performance indicators for university libraries in Taiwan.
The study was comprised of two stages: the indicator construction stage included primary literature review based on the existing library performance standard ISO 11620 and related research. The process of exploring the indicators of the performance measurement for university libraries was designed by Delphi method. The Delphi panel was composed of 21 professional library administers. The study was ended by all the participants reaching consensus and stability towards applicable performance indicators through three rounds of questionnaire survey.
The research results were showed as follows. First, tools and models of performance measurement vary in different university libraries due to various purposes and needs. Second, accomplishing overall operational performance measurement still has its difficulties and limitations. Third, four referable dimensions of performance measurement are “Resources & Infrastructure,” “Use,” “Efficiency,” and “Potentials & Development.” Ultimately, the study concludes 27 key performance indicators. Suggestions are provided for practical applications and future research. The study provides an applicable set of performance indicators, and it is expected to be a significant reference for university libraries.
|
author2 |
Hao-Ren Ke |
author_facet |
Hao-Ren Ke Yi-Syuan Wang 王怡璇 |
author |
Yi-Syuan Wang 王怡璇 |
spellingShingle |
Yi-Syuan Wang 王怡璇 Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan |
author_sort |
Yi-Syuan Wang |
title |
Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan |
title_short |
Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan |
title_full |
Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan |
title_fullStr |
Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan |
title_sort |
exploring performance indicators for university libraries in taiwan |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49716648065174623943 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yisyuanwang exploringperformanceindicatorsforuniversitylibrariesintaiwan AT wángyíxuán exploringperformanceindicatorsforuniversitylibrariesintaiwan AT yisyuanwang dàxuétúshūguǎnjīxiàopínggūzhǐbiāozhīyánjiū AT wángyíxuán dàxuétúshūguǎnjīxiàopínggūzhǐbiāozhīyánjiū |
_version_ |
1718094818665562112 |