Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 圖書資訊學研究所 === 99 === University libraries play an important role in universities not only in terms of information resources and services but facilitation and support on research. Therefore, the operational performance becomes an essential consideration in university libraries....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Syuan Wang, 王怡璇
Other Authors: Hao-Ren Ke
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49716648065174623943
id ndltd-TW-099NTNU5447038
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-099NTNU54470382015-10-19T04:03:41Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49716648065174623943 Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan 大學圖書館績效評估指標之研究 Yi-Syuan Wang 王怡璇 碩士 國立臺灣師範大學 圖書資訊學研究所 99 University libraries play an important role in universities not only in terms of information resources and services but facilitation and support on research. Therefore, the operational performance becomes an essential consideration in university libraries. However, lacking standardized and universal guidelines make the practical implementation of performance evaluation hard to achieve. This study aims to analyze and develop a set of feasible and suitable performance indicators for university libraries in Taiwan. The study was comprised of two stages: the indicator construction stage included primary literature review based on the existing library performance standard ISO 11620 and related research. The process of exploring the indicators of the performance measurement for university libraries was designed by Delphi method. The Delphi panel was composed of 21 professional library administers. The study was ended by all the participants reaching consensus and stability towards applicable performance indicators through three rounds of questionnaire survey. The research results were showed as follows. First, tools and models of performance measurement vary in different university libraries due to various purposes and needs. Second, accomplishing overall operational performance measurement still has its difficulties and limitations. Third, four referable dimensions of performance measurement are “Resources & Infrastructure,” “Use,” “Efficiency,” and “Potentials & Development.” Ultimately, the study concludes 27 key performance indicators. Suggestions are provided for practical applications and future research. The study provides an applicable set of performance indicators, and it is expected to be a significant reference for university libraries. Hao-Ren Ke 柯皓仁 2011 學位論文 ; thesis 181 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 圖書資訊學研究所 === 99 === University libraries play an important role in universities not only in terms of information resources and services but facilitation and support on research. Therefore, the operational performance becomes an essential consideration in university libraries. However, lacking standardized and universal guidelines make the practical implementation of performance evaluation hard to achieve. This study aims to analyze and develop a set of feasible and suitable performance indicators for university libraries in Taiwan. The study was comprised of two stages: the indicator construction stage included primary literature review based on the existing library performance standard ISO 11620 and related research. The process of exploring the indicators of the performance measurement for university libraries was designed by Delphi method. The Delphi panel was composed of 21 professional library administers. The study was ended by all the participants reaching consensus and stability towards applicable performance indicators through three rounds of questionnaire survey. The research results were showed as follows. First, tools and models of performance measurement vary in different university libraries due to various purposes and needs. Second, accomplishing overall operational performance measurement still has its difficulties and limitations. Third, four referable dimensions of performance measurement are “Resources & Infrastructure,” “Use,” “Efficiency,” and “Potentials & Development.” Ultimately, the study concludes 27 key performance indicators. Suggestions are provided for practical applications and future research. The study provides an applicable set of performance indicators, and it is expected to be a significant reference for university libraries.
author2 Hao-Ren Ke
author_facet Hao-Ren Ke
Yi-Syuan Wang
王怡璇
author Yi-Syuan Wang
王怡璇
spellingShingle Yi-Syuan Wang
王怡璇
Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
author_sort Yi-Syuan Wang
title Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
title_short Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
title_full Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
title_fullStr Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Performance Indicators for University Libraries in Taiwan
title_sort exploring performance indicators for university libraries in taiwan
publishDate 2011
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49716648065174623943
work_keys_str_mv AT yisyuanwang exploringperformanceindicatorsforuniversitylibrariesintaiwan
AT wángyíxuán exploringperformanceindicatorsforuniversitylibrariesintaiwan
AT yisyuanwang dàxuétúshūguǎnjīxiàopínggūzhǐbiāozhīyánjiū
AT wángyíxuán dàxuétúshūguǎnjīxiàopínggūzhǐbiāozhīyánjiū
_version_ 1718094818665562112