返璞者的鄉野路--移居者之經驗學習與風格移轉

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 社會教育學系 === 99 === This study aims to discover and describe a kind of lifestyle in current, which I gave a name “返璞”(the Cradles). By grounded theory method, my study attempts to inquire experiential learning and possibility of style-shift for “urban-to-rural return migrations”. P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: WU, PEI-YING, 吳沛瀅
Other Authors: LIN JENN CHUEN
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/41148463265776800367
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 社會教育學系 === 99 === This study aims to discover and describe a kind of lifestyle in current, which I gave a name “返璞”(the Cradles). By grounded theory method, my study attempts to inquire experiential learning and possibility of style-shift for “urban-to-rural return migrations”. People today live in the situation of g/localization flow, have to face widely applications of developed technological tools / social media, and the rise of culture creatives industries. These factors might stimulate urban residents start to trace another possibility of way to live, to find out a cradle beyond the rural. Through reviewed concepts below helped to increasing the theoretical sensitivities to explore and explain the exist phenomenon. Include of the point of experience and experiential learning of J. Dewy and D. Kolb; lifestyle and 4 kinds of capital by P. Boudieu; the ideas from creative capital and “quality of place” from R. Florida, and C. Landry, extend to “creative ecologies” of J. Howkins; and the point of view of “amenity space” by Lin Jenn Chuen(林振春); in the other hand, I sort out multiple lifestyles, include of Lohas, Lovos, voluntary to simplicity, slow food/cittaslow/downshift movement, culture creative, and the design concept of “C2C”. By reviewed/grounded these complex ideas to make the outline of “返璞”. The field of study at Hualian, the largest county/the less resident of Taiwan, by observed and interviewed 11 representative objects/migrations who made Hualian active and lively. These migrations I named “the Cradles”. Conclusions show several points: The Cradles have green claims, they use second-hand objects, recycling the waste, and create daily articles or merchandise by local materials, such as driftwood. They are high independence, adaptable, and tend to restrictedless; they’d like to resign the “rhythm” of natural and are willing to reflective thinking and active practice what they “experience”. Otherwise, some of them are willing to practice “Non-mainstream ideas”, such as birth at home. In conclusion, “the Cradles” is amenity/tolerant for others people (include Neighbor and visitor), environment, cultural appearance, and social network, etc. They try to build up a new kind of lifestyle or said “an amenity status”, which have some features: “simplicity but not poor, cooperation, trust and mutual reliance, optimism and harmony, willing to learn from inside/outside. The Cradles is kind of talent, who is helpful for creative ecologies/ Economic/quality of space, or might said, is a key factor of development of cultural creative industry.