The Influence of Learning Style on On-line Learning Frequency and Learning Achievement - Examples of Studying Engineer Courses

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 工業教育學系 === 99 === In the information era, the on-line learning system has become an important learning tool for learners. For this reason, it is necessary to investigate the appropriateness of on-line learning system for individual learners. The purpose of this study is to invest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-Yu, Shen, 沈家伃
Other Authors: Chien-Pen, Chuang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/36217105011538283924
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 工業教育學系 === 99 === In the information era, the on-line learning system has become an important learning tool for learners. For this reason, it is necessary to investigate the appropriateness of on-line learning system for individual learners. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences of frequency and achievement for different learning style learners who used on-line learning system. First, we analyzed the distribution of the learning style for on-line learning learners in the field of engineering. Next, we analyzed the difference of student's satisfaction and achievement. Finally, the differences of logon frequency of different learning style learners was calculated. The observation method was used to record learners’logon frequency. Their satisfaction and achievement were surveyed with questionnaires. In a span of three months, from November 2010 to Jaunary 2011, the data collected from the convenience sampling, and 196 learners were valid for the study. The statistic methods, such as t-test, one-sample t-test, paired-sample t-test and one-way ANOVA, were conducted to analyze related data. The results of research are as the followings: 1. The most learning style of engineering students who used on-line learning is “assimilator” and the next is “converger.” 2. Students' satisfaction reaches the level of significance. 3. The self-estimation of learning achievement reaches the level of significance. 4. The different learning style learners have significant difference on courses satisfaction and the best one is“diverger.” 5. The different learning style learners have significant difference on self-estimation of learning achievement and the best is “diverger.” 6. The logon frequency for different learning styles of engineering courses learners are decreased by course progress of self learning. 7. The“diverger” learners' logon frequency is the most stable group among all groups.