none

• Main Authors: Hui-fang Chin, 秦慧芳
• Other Authors: Li-Mo Yan
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2011
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/90483939363555861279

碩士 === 國立屏東教育大學 === 華語文教學碩士學位學程 === 99 === The Ministry of Education set up a Duyin Tongyi Hui讀音統一會 (the Bureau of Unified Pronunciation) in the year of 1913. The purpose was to provide the country a unified pronunciation for the national standard language sound. The pronunciation set by the Duyin Tongyi Hui later known as the old national pronunciation老國音. In the year of 1932, the Ministry of Education announced a Guoyin Changyong Zihui國音常用字彙 (National Sound of Common Used Vocabulary) based on the Peiking pronunciation, rhyme, and tone system, as well as based on the speech sound spoken by those who had finished at least secondary education in Beijing. The Guo Yin國音 was later known as the new national pronunciation新國音. Today, the standard of speech sound used in Taiwan is still based on Beijing system. This research, based on Wang Pu’s王璞 Guoyin Jingyin Duizhao Biao國音京音對照表 (National Vocal Tone Table of Peiking pronunciation) as the center, mainly discusses the differences among the tone of the old national pronunciation, the Peiking pronunciation, and the new national pronunciation. First, the differences between the old national pronunciation and the Peiking pronunciation are as follows: 1. The most difference between the old national pronunciation and the Peiking pronunciation is on the parts of the the separation of sharp and round sounds in the old national pronunciation, while the Peiking pronunciation doesn’t have the ones. 2. The old national pronunciation has two more voiced vowels ng(兀) and v(万) than the Peiking pronunciation. 3. The Peiking pronunciation doesn’t have the -io(ㄧㄛ) final, while the old national pronunciation does. Most of the Peiking pronunciation is the -üe(ㄩㄝ) final. 4. The Peiking pronunciation doesn’t have the -ê (ㄝ) final, while the old national pronunciation does. Most of the Peiking pronunciation is the -o(ㄛ) final. Second, the differences between the old national pronunciation and the new national pronunciation are as follows: 1. The most difference between the old national pronunciation and the new national pronunciation is on the parts of the the separation of sharp and round sounds in the old national pronunciation, while the new national pronunciation doesn’t have the ones. 2. The old national pronunciation has three voiced vowels v(万), ng(兀) and gn(广), while the new national pronunciation doesn’t have any. 3. The new national pronunciation doesn’t have the -io(ㄧㄛ) final, while the old national pronunciation does. Most of the new national pronunciation is the -üe(ㄩㄝ) final. 4. The new national pronunciation doesn’t have the -üo(ㄩㄛ) final, while the old national pronunciation does. Most of the new national pronunciation is the -üe(ㄩㄝ) final. 5. The -e(ㄜ) final with the consonant for the lips in the old national pronunciation will be changed to -o(ㄛ) final in the new national pronunciation. 6. The -ê (ㄝ) final in the old national pronunciation can be used alone, while being considered as a rhyme character only in the new national pronunciation, and it cannot be considered as a final rhyme. 7. The -ong(ㄨㄥ) final with the consonant for the lips in the old national pronunciation will be changed to -eng(ㄥ) final in the new national pronunciation. 8. The old national pronunciation and the Peiking pronunciation have short sounds as the fourth tone in Chinese pronunciation, while the new national pronunciation doesn’t have. 9. The new national pronunciation with 5% in accordance with the old national pronunciation, 80% in accordance with the Peiking pronunciation only, neither according to the old national pronunciation nor the Peiking pronunciation is 15% in comparison of the “National Sound of Common Used Vocabulary” and the “National Vocal Tone Table of the Peiking pronunciation”. The old national pronunciation was voted democratically by 44 individuals, compared to the development of the new formulation of the country sound and sound-trial with only 5 members, but the old national pronunciation which was voted democratically faced several obstacles while the success of the new national pronunciation decided only by a minority. We know the way of developing the old national pronunciation not necessarily the reasons for the old national pronunciation’s failure. The standard formulation for common language of a country cannot just rely on academic philosophy, but also the government, media, and educational promotion to be successful.