| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 體育研究所 === 99 === The study was designed to investigate movement analysis model and traditional teaching method on the performance of learning the skill of forehand and backhand of tennis for elementary school students. And by this to find out the learning effects when movement analysis model and traditional teaching method put into practice. The study use semi experimental design, “pre test-post test equivalent group” in the “quasi-experimental design” was adopted, and the research objects were tennis kids in Miaoli County club. There were two classes separated at random, one of the class was “experimental group” with 13 kids, using movement analysis model to teach. The other class was “control group” also with 13 kids, using traditional teaching method to each. After four weeks of forehand and backhand practicing, “two-way mixed design ANCOVA” to analyze and test the learning results of the two groups.
The following conclusions can be drawn from this study:
1. There were obvious difference for kids to learn forehand skill among all groups between Movement analysis model and traditional practice method. However, experimental group was better than the other.
2. There were obvious difference for kids to learn backhand skill among all groups between Movement analysis model and traditional practice method. However, experimental group was better than the other.
3. There were obvious difference on the performance of forehand and backhand when movement analysis model as a curriculum project for kids to learn forehand and backhand.
The research results above indicated that movement analysis model as a curriculum project could improve the students’ forehand and backhand, teachers also could use this model as a reference when they design the physical education class in the future.
Keywords：movement analysis model, tennis skills
|
|---|
