Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班 === 99 === The main purpose of this study is to explore the possible implications for different definitions of quartiles taught in high schools. In addition, the two formulae are also compared with six others that are found popular in literature according to their p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 黃瑜瑜
Other Authors: 江振東
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52262015141255568721
id ndltd-TW-099NCCU5479010
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-099NCCU54790102015-10-13T19:07:20Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52262015141255568721 Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others 國高中教材及其它六種常見四分位數公式之比較研究 黃瑜瑜 碩士 國立政治大學 應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班 99 The main purpose of this study is to explore the possible implications for different definitions of quartiles taught in high schools. In addition, the two formulae are also compared with six others that are found popular in literature according to their performances under different distributions. The main findings of the study are summarized as follows: 1.Differences are found in the calculation of quartile based on the definition used in junior and senior high schools. Specifically, when the data size is N=4k+1 (k is a positive integer), Q1 and Q3 calculated using the formula taught in senior high schools may not be same as the 25th and 75th percentiles, the way junior high students are taught to calculate Q1 and Q3. 2.Assuming that data come from five right-skewed distributions ( , , ), chi-squared distributions with degrees of freedom 1, 5, and 10, and Exp( ), Exp( ), exponential distributions with means 10 and 15, and a symmetrical distribution (normal distribution with mean 100 and standard deviation 10), simulation studies are carried out to assess the performances of the eight formulae in terms of bias, standard deviation, root mean square error and average relative error. Generally speaking, no differences are found when the sample sizes are large. Noticeable differences, on the other hand, are found under the situations of small sample sizes, particularly when N=40, 41, 42, and 43. However, since the performances varied dramatically, there appears no clear winner among the eight formulae. Although the performances of the two formulae taught in junior high and senior high schools scarcely perform as the “best”, they are easily understood, and clearly appropriate for use in teaching high school students the concept of quartiles. Key words: Quartiles, Simulation studies 江振東 學位論文 ; thesis 154 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班 === 99 === The main purpose of this study is to explore the possible implications for different definitions of quartiles taught in high schools. In addition, the two formulae are also compared with six others that are found popular in literature according to their performances under different distributions. The main findings of the study are summarized as follows: 1.Differences are found in the calculation of quartile based on the definition used in junior and senior high schools. Specifically, when the data size is N=4k+1 (k is a positive integer), Q1 and Q3 calculated using the formula taught in senior high schools may not be same as the 25th and 75th percentiles, the way junior high students are taught to calculate Q1 and Q3. 2.Assuming that data come from five right-skewed distributions ( , , ), chi-squared distributions with degrees of freedom 1, 5, and 10, and Exp( ), Exp( ), exponential distributions with means 10 and 15, and a symmetrical distribution (normal distribution with mean 100 and standard deviation 10), simulation studies are carried out to assess the performances of the eight formulae in terms of bias, standard deviation, root mean square error and average relative error. Generally speaking, no differences are found when the sample sizes are large. Noticeable differences, on the other hand, are found under the situations of small sample sizes, particularly when N=40, 41, 42, and 43. However, since the performances varied dramatically, there appears no clear winner among the eight formulae. Although the performances of the two formulae taught in junior high and senior high schools scarcely perform as the “best”, they are easily understood, and clearly appropriate for use in teaching high school students the concept of quartiles. Key words: Quartiles, Simulation studies
author2 江振東
author_facet 江振東
黃瑜瑜
author 黃瑜瑜
spellingShingle 黃瑜瑜
Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
author_sort 黃瑜瑜
title Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
title_short Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
title_full Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
title_fullStr Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
title_sort comparisons of the quartile formulae given in high school text books and six others
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52262015141255568721
work_keys_str_mv AT huángyúyú comparisonsofthequartileformulaegiveninhighschooltextbooksandsixothers
AT huángyúyú guógāozhōngjiàocáijíqítāliùzhǒngchángjiànsìfēnwèishùgōngshìzhībǐjiàoyánjiū
_version_ 1718041198518599680