| Summary: | 碩士 === 逢甲大學 === 都市計畫所 === 99 === In order to measure public participation effect in urban planning process, this study developed a Participatory Planning Platform of Web-PPGIS for improving urban planning process and regional decision making. However, this study focuses on three crucial issues: (1) the 3D visualization WEB-PPGIS model can be developed for the participatory planning issues through the Google Earth API, (2) through this platform we can records some important information for urban planning planner, and (3) this platform also can help end users to participate in decision-making for planning and to improve the public participation qualities of planning. In present study, more specifically, comparing difference level of expression pattern with traditional presentations method (through a PPT File) with advanced concept of Web-PPGIS (through a 3D Visualization Map base on Google Earth API) investigates the difference public participation effect at urban planning process. In this innovative platform, as an ideal tool can record many users cognition behaviors and information at urban planning specifically issues such as (1) cognition of planning, (2) interesting area of study site, (3) ideal planning case, (4) presented of dynamic 3D visualization map…and so on. On the other hand, to understand the deference levels or cognition behaviors of traditional presentations model and Web-PPGIS at new campus design of Feng Chia University, two ways of meeting presentation and questionnaire was designed to record information in this study process. After that, the multivariate analysis of factor analysis presented the platform has improved compared with the presentation at this study producer, the questionnaires results is the Factor One (Name of “Activity”) which is the Web-PPGIS platform (Mean Value is 5.243) is better than traditional presentations method (Mean Value is 4.396); the Factor two (Name of “Power Sharing") which is the Web-PPGIS platform (Mean Value is 4.073) is better than traditional presentations method (Mean Value is 3.252); the Factor three (Name of “Volition of Participation ") which is the Web-PPGIS platform (Mean Value is 4.738) is better than traditional presentations method (Mean Value is 3.507), respectively. For this reason, this analysis result of public participation topic at the Web-PPGIS platform is better the traditional presentations method. At the same time, Spatial Autocorrelation method to analyze the users’ suggestion and coordinates shows the aggregation phenomenon at Web-PPGIS result in this study produce. This information can be returned into the final planning results for a planner through this WEB system. Finally, the study result shows that the public participation issue in urban planning process can be appropriate presented by Web-PPGIS and this information can effetely improve the decision-making for residents of urban planning process in the future.
|
|---|
