A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling

碩士 === 中原大學 === 心理學研究所 === 99 === In the past, the research of model misspecification focused on linear effect, as the result, we knew very little about the impact of nonlinear effect misspecification. When we studied nonlinear effect, we didn’t tack into consideration of possible bias effect cause...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Chung Lin, 林立中
Other Authors: Li-Chiao Huang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/06669449276714720053
id ndltd-TW-099CYCU5071074
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-099CYCU50710742015-10-13T20:23:26Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/06669449276714720053 A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling 結構方程模型誤設之模擬研究:忽略非線性作用和方法變異 Li-Chung Lin 林立中 碩士 中原大學 心理學研究所 99 In the past, the research of model misspecification focused on linear effect, as the result, we knew very little about the impact of nonlinear effect misspecification. When we studied nonlinear effect, we didn’t tack into consideration of possible bias effect caused by method variance. However, these two model misspecifications may affect model estimation simultaneously. The main goal of this study is to discuss how nonlinear effect and method variance misspecification impact the estimation of predictive validity, trait correlation, and its standard error, in addition to the power of fit indices. I used the Monte Carlo simulation method to establish seven types of models and manipulate design factors such as the intercorrelations among traits, covariances among method variances, and the amount of variance explained by method variances. The results demonstrated that power of fit indices could be change with design factors and I found that χ2, SRMR, GAMMA, TLI, CFI, and RNI would detect model misspecification successfully while RMSEA had the worst performance and couldn’t detect it. Regarding the impact of parameter estimation, misspecification of method variance underestimated structural parameters of linear effect and the bias changed with different design factors with a smaller influenced on nonlinear effect. Misspecification of nonlinear effect overestimated in predict validity of quadratic effect or interaction effect with a smaller influenced on linear effect. When hypothesized model misspecified method variance and nonlinear effect simultaneously, it could change the estimation of structural parameters of linear effect and nonlinear effect. Howerever, it didn’t aggravate the bias of nonlinear effect. Furthermore, model misspecification could underestimate the standard error of structural parameters and impact the hypothesis test which caused a bias conclusion. Through my research, it can clarify the common impact of these two model misspecification of parameter estimation, and provides researchers with which fit indices that can detect model misspecification more effectively. Li-Chiao Huang 黃麗嬌 2011 學位論文 ; thesis 137 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中原大學 === 心理學研究所 === 99 === In the past, the research of model misspecification focused on linear effect, as the result, we knew very little about the impact of nonlinear effect misspecification. When we studied nonlinear effect, we didn’t tack into consideration of possible bias effect caused by method variance. However, these two model misspecifications may affect model estimation simultaneously. The main goal of this study is to discuss how nonlinear effect and method variance misspecification impact the estimation of predictive validity, trait correlation, and its standard error, in addition to the power of fit indices. I used the Monte Carlo simulation method to establish seven types of models and manipulate design factors such as the intercorrelations among traits, covariances among method variances, and the amount of variance explained by method variances. The results demonstrated that power of fit indices could be change with design factors and I found that χ2, SRMR, GAMMA, TLI, CFI, and RNI would detect model misspecification successfully while RMSEA had the worst performance and couldn’t detect it. Regarding the impact of parameter estimation, misspecification of method variance underestimated structural parameters of linear effect and the bias changed with different design factors with a smaller influenced on nonlinear effect. Misspecification of nonlinear effect overestimated in predict validity of quadratic effect or interaction effect with a smaller influenced on linear effect. When hypothesized model misspecified method variance and nonlinear effect simultaneously, it could change the estimation of structural parameters of linear effect and nonlinear effect. Howerever, it didn’t aggravate the bias of nonlinear effect. Furthermore, model misspecification could underestimate the standard error of structural parameters and impact the hypothesis test which caused a bias conclusion. Through my research, it can clarify the common impact of these two model misspecification of parameter estimation, and provides researchers with which fit indices that can detect model misspecification more effectively.
author2 Li-Chiao Huang
author_facet Li-Chiao Huang
Li-Chung Lin
林立中
author Li-Chung Lin
林立中
spellingShingle Li-Chung Lin
林立中
A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
author_sort Li-Chung Lin
title A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
title_short A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
title_full A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
title_fullStr A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
title_full_unstemmed A simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
title_sort simulation study of model misspecification omitting nonlinear effects and method variances in structural equation modeling
publishDate 2011
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/06669449276714720053
work_keys_str_mv AT lichunglin asimulationstudyofmodelmisspecificationomittingnonlineareffectsandmethodvariancesinstructuralequationmodeling
AT línlìzhōng asimulationstudyofmodelmisspecificationomittingnonlineareffectsandmethodvariancesinstructuralequationmodeling
AT lichunglin jiégòufāngchéngmóxíngwùshèzhīmónǐyánjiūhūlüèfēixiànxìngzuòyònghéfāngfǎbiànyì
AT línlìzhōng jiégòufāngchéngmóxíngwùshèzhīmónǐyánjiūhūlüèfēixiànxìngzuòyònghéfāngfǎbiànyì
AT lichunglin simulationstudyofmodelmisspecificationomittingnonlineareffectsandmethodvariancesinstructuralequationmodeling
AT línlìzhōng simulationstudyofmodelmisspecificationomittingnonlineareffectsandmethodvariancesinstructuralequationmodeling
_version_ 1718047217208524800