A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation

碩士 === 雲林科技大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 98 === Since the court was established in compliance with the Intellectual Property Organization Act promulgated on March 28, 2007 in Taiwan, and the I.P.-related cases are mainly heard in accordance with the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, effective July 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shih-Hung Lin, 林士弘
Other Authors: Dennis Y.H. Tsai
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/37655372932968546104
id ndltd-TW-098YUNT5705002
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098YUNT57050022015-10-13T18:58:56Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/37655372932968546104 A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation 專利權無效訴訟之研究-以專利侵權訴訟中法院自為認定專利權有效性為中心 Shih-Hung Lin 林士弘 碩士 雲林科技大學 科技法律研究所 98 Since the court was established in compliance with the Intellectual Property Organization Act promulgated on March 28, 2007 in Taiwan, and the I.P.-related cases are mainly heard in accordance with the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, effective July 1, 2008, the protection of I.P. in Taiwan is turning into a new page with the rule of Article 16 of the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act: When a party claims or defends that an intellectual property right shall be cancelled or revoked, the court shall judge based on the merit of the case, the Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Administrative Litigation Procedure, Trademark Act, Patent Act, Species of Plants and Seedling Act, or other applicable laws concerning the stay of an action . The defender related to patent infringement litigation can possibly claim the related patent right is invalid under the new evidence, and the Judges will take the application into consideration, and make a decision whether the related patent right is valid or invalid before patent infringe judgment. The purpose of this research is to compare and contrast the possible consequence of the new Act effective in Taiwan by collecting the theories and suggestions from experts. This research is also going to study the current judgment system of patent rights in U.S. and Japan, especially for the foundations of legislate about to the validity of patent rights and the different between Taiwan and U.S. or Japan. Base on said researches, this study provides some suggestions and conclusions for Taiwan patent litigation system and the relationship between the patent rights competent authority- TIPO and the Intellectual Property Court within the submission. Dennis Y.H. Tsai 蔡岳勳 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 132 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 雲林科技大學 === 科技法律研究所 === 98 === Since the court was established in compliance with the Intellectual Property Organization Act promulgated on March 28, 2007 in Taiwan, and the I.P.-related cases are mainly heard in accordance with the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act, effective July 1, 2008, the protection of I.P. in Taiwan is turning into a new page with the rule of Article 16 of the Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act: When a party claims or defends that an intellectual property right shall be cancelled or revoked, the court shall judge based on the merit of the case, the Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Administrative Litigation Procedure, Trademark Act, Patent Act, Species of Plants and Seedling Act, or other applicable laws concerning the stay of an action . The defender related to patent infringement litigation can possibly claim the related patent right is invalid under the new evidence, and the Judges will take the application into consideration, and make a decision whether the related patent right is valid or invalid before patent infringe judgment. The purpose of this research is to compare and contrast the possible consequence of the new Act effective in Taiwan by collecting the theories and suggestions from experts. This research is also going to study the current judgment system of patent rights in U.S. and Japan, especially for the foundations of legislate about to the validity of patent rights and the different between Taiwan and U.S. or Japan. Base on said researches, this study provides some suggestions and conclusions for Taiwan patent litigation system and the relationship between the patent rights competent authority- TIPO and the Intellectual Property Court within the submission.
author2 Dennis Y.H. Tsai
author_facet Dennis Y.H. Tsai
Shih-Hung Lin
林士弘
author Shih-Hung Lin
林士弘
spellingShingle Shih-Hung Lin
林士弘
A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation
author_sort Shih-Hung Lin
title A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation
title_short A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation
title_full A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation
title_fullStr A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation
title_full_unstemmed A Study of Issues Related to the Invalid Determination of Patent Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation
title_sort study of issues related to the invalid determination of patent rights in patent infringement litigation
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/37655372932968546104
work_keys_str_mv AT shihhunglin astudyofissuesrelatedtotheinvaliddeterminationofpatentrightsinpatentinfringementlitigation
AT línshìhóng astudyofissuesrelatedtotheinvaliddeterminationofpatentrightsinpatentinfringementlitigation
AT shihhunglin zhuānlìquánwúxiàosùsòngzhīyánjiūyǐzhuānlìqīnquánsùsòngzhōngfǎyuànzìwèirèndìngzhuānlìquányǒuxiàoxìngwèizhōngxīn
AT línshìhóng zhuānlìquánwúxiàosùsòngzhīyánjiūyǐzhuānlìqīnquánsùsòngzhōngfǎyuànzìwèirèndìngzhuānlìquányǒuxiàoxìngwèizhōngxīn
AT shihhunglin studyofissuesrelatedtotheinvaliddeterminationofpatentrightsinpatentinfringementlitigation
AT línshìhóng studyofissuesrelatedtotheinvaliddeterminationofpatentrightsinpatentinfringementlitigation
_version_ 1718039918725300224