A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 教育政策與領導研究所碩士班 === 98 === The purpose of this thesis is, on one hand, to investigate the junior high school teachers’ opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County, and, on the other hand, to compare the differences in opinions among the teachers with di...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02892423776130411063 |
id |
ndltd-TW-098TKU05631036 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-098TKU056310362016-04-20T04:18:04Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02892423776130411063 A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County 臺北縣國民中學教師對實施教師專業發展評鑑意見調查研究 Want-Ting Yang 楊琬婷 碩士 淡江大學 教育政策與領導研究所碩士班 98 The purpose of this thesis is, on one hand, to investigate the junior high school teachers’ opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County, and, on the other hand, to compare the differences in opinions among the teachers with different background variables. Adopting a questionnaire method based on “The Questionnaire on the Junior High School Teachers in Taipei County,” this research, conducted among the teachers with 631 valid questionnaires returned, involves a comprehensive data analysis using averages, standard deviations, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), Scheffé''s method, etc. The findings of this research are as follows: 1. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the content of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “usage of evaluation result” is higher and “evaluation method” is lower. 2. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “supplementary measure” is higher and “support for evaluation” is lower. 3. Opinions on the content of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position. 4. Opinions on the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position. Based on the above conclusions, the researcher proposes concrete suggestions for the educational administration and the administration of junior high school in Taipei County as a reference for executing teacher evaluation for professional development and the follow-up studies. Kuo-Shih Yang 楊國賜 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 155 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 教育政策與領導研究所碩士班 === 98 === The purpose of this thesis is, on one hand, to investigate the junior high school teachers’ opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County, and, on the other hand, to compare the differences in opinions among the teachers with different background variables. Adopting a questionnaire method based on “The Questionnaire on the Junior High School Teachers in Taipei County,” this research, conducted among the teachers with 631 valid questionnaires returned, involves a comprehensive data analysis using averages, standard deviations, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), Scheffé''s method, etc.
The findings of this research are as follows:
1. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the content of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “usage of evaluation result” is higher and “evaluation method” is lower.
2. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “supplementary measure” is higher and “support for evaluation” is lower.
3. Opinions on the content of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position.
4. Opinions on the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position.
Based on the above conclusions, the researcher proposes concrete suggestions for
the educational administration and the administration of junior high school in Taipei County as a reference for executing teacher evaluation for professional development and the follow-up studies.
|
author2 |
Kuo-Shih Yang |
author_facet |
Kuo-Shih Yang Want-Ting Yang 楊琬婷 |
author |
Want-Ting Yang 楊琬婷 |
spellingShingle |
Want-Ting Yang 楊琬婷 A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County |
author_sort |
Want-Ting Yang |
title |
A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County |
title_short |
A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County |
title_full |
A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County |
title_fullStr |
A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County |
title_sort |
study of the junior high school teachers' opinions on teacher evaluation for professional development in taipei county |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02892423776130411063 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wanttingyang astudyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty AT yángwǎntíng astudyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty AT wanttingyang táiběixiànguómínzhōngxuéjiàoshīduìshíshījiàoshīzhuānyèfāzhǎnpíngjiànyìjiàndiàocháyánjiū AT yángwǎntíng táiběixiànguómínzhōngxuéjiàoshīduìshíshījiàoshīzhuānyèfāzhǎnpíngjiànyìjiàndiàocháyánjiū AT wanttingyang studyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty AT yángwǎntíng studyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty |
_version_ |
1718229161959489536 |