A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 教育政策與領導研究所碩士班 === 98 === The purpose of this thesis is, on one hand, to investigate the junior high school teachers’ opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County, and, on the other hand, to compare the differences in opinions among the teachers with di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Want-Ting Yang, 楊琬婷
Other Authors: Kuo-Shih Yang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02892423776130411063
id ndltd-TW-098TKU05631036
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098TKU056310362016-04-20T04:18:04Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02892423776130411063 A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County 臺北縣國民中學教師對實施教師專業發展評鑑意見調查研究 Want-Ting Yang 楊琬婷 碩士 淡江大學 教育政策與領導研究所碩士班 98 The purpose of this thesis is, on one hand, to investigate the junior high school teachers’ opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County, and, on the other hand, to compare the differences in opinions among the teachers with different background variables. Adopting a questionnaire method based on “The Questionnaire on the Junior High School Teachers in Taipei County,” this research, conducted among the teachers with 631 valid questionnaires returned, involves a comprehensive data analysis using averages, standard deviations, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), Scheffé''s method, etc. The findings of this research are as follows: 1. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the content of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “usage of evaluation result” is higher and “evaluation method” is lower. 2. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “supplementary measure” is higher and “support for evaluation” is lower. 3. Opinions on the content of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position. 4. Opinions on the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position. Based on the above conclusions, the researcher proposes concrete suggestions for the educational administration and the administration of junior high school in Taipei County as a reference for executing teacher evaluation for professional development and the follow-up studies. Kuo-Shih Yang 楊國賜 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 155 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 教育政策與領導研究所碩士班 === 98 === The purpose of this thesis is, on one hand, to investigate the junior high school teachers’ opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County, and, on the other hand, to compare the differences in opinions among the teachers with different background variables. Adopting a questionnaire method based on “The Questionnaire on the Junior High School Teachers in Taipei County,” this research, conducted among the teachers with 631 valid questionnaires returned, involves a comprehensive data analysis using averages, standard deviations, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), Scheffé''s method, etc. The findings of this research are as follows: 1. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the content of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “usage of evaluation result” is higher and “evaluation method” is lower. 2. The level of junior high school teachers’ identification with the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development is found to be “middle,” among which “supplementary measure” is higher and “support for evaluation” is lower. 3. Opinions on the content of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position. 4. Opinions on the implementation of teacher evaluation for professional development differ among junior high school teachers with different background variables, like their gender, age, years of service, and position. Based on the above conclusions, the researcher proposes concrete suggestions for the educational administration and the administration of junior high school in Taipei County as a reference for executing teacher evaluation for professional development and the follow-up studies.
author2 Kuo-Shih Yang
author_facet Kuo-Shih Yang
Want-Ting Yang
楊琬婷
author Want-Ting Yang
楊琬婷
spellingShingle Want-Ting Yang
楊琬婷
A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
author_sort Want-Ting Yang
title A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
title_short A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
title_full A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
title_fullStr A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
title_full_unstemmed A Study of the Junior High School Teachers' Opinions on Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development in Taipei County
title_sort study of the junior high school teachers' opinions on teacher evaluation for professional development in taipei county
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02892423776130411063
work_keys_str_mv AT wanttingyang astudyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty
AT yángwǎntíng astudyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty
AT wanttingyang táiběixiànguómínzhōngxuéjiàoshīduìshíshījiàoshīzhuānyèfāzhǎnpíngjiànyìjiàndiàocháyánjiū
AT yángwǎntíng táiběixiànguómínzhōngxuéjiàoshīduìshíshījiàoshīzhuānyèfāzhǎnpíngjiànyìjiàndiàocháyánjiū
AT wanttingyang studyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty
AT yángwǎntíng studyofthejuniorhighschoolteachersopinionsonteacherevaluationforprofessionaldevelopmentintaipeicounty
_version_ 1718229161959489536