Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks

碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 電腦與通訊研究所 === 98 === In Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (WSAN), when the power of sensor nodes is insufficient or wireless communications and deployment environment become unstable, the sensed data may lose in the way to the destination. Therefore, how to design an efficient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chien-Hsing Chung, 鍾見興
Other Authors: Chiu-ching Tuan
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/4559zq
id ndltd-TW-098TIT05652045
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098TIT056520452019-05-15T20:33:25Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/4559zq Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks 無線傳感器網路之叢集偵測法容錯機制 Chien-Hsing Chung 鍾見興 碩士 國立臺北科技大學 電腦與通訊研究所 98 In Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (WSAN), when the power of sensor nodes is insufficient or wireless communications and deployment environment become unstable, the sensed data may lose in the way to the destination. Therefore, how to design an efficient fault tolerance mechanism becomes an important issue in WSAN. However, the existing fault-tolerant mechanisms are mostly concentrated on the routing link error handling. That is, research for error sensing data is little. When sensor nodes may sense inaccurately or invalidly, the error sensing data will cause the actuator to make error response and handling. Therefore, this paper proposed a Clustering Detection Method (CDM) based on WSAN. This method use the discrete degree of sensing data to judge the correctness by ruling out the error sensor nodes. CDM also can combine with routing link fault tolerant mechanism to construct a complete fault tolerance mechanism. In performance analysis, we compare CDM with Distributed Fault Detection Method (DFDM), and define three metrics: Faulty Sensor Detection Accuracy (FSDA), False Alarm Rate (FAR), Monitoring Scope and Sensor Nodes Relationship (MSSNR) for measuring the performance of CDM and DFDM. From the simulation results, when the average neighbor of nodes 7, CDM was better than DFDM by 28% on the FAR, by 37% on the FSDA, respectively. When the average neighbor of nodes is 20, CDM was better than DFDM by 10% on the FAR, by 19% on the FSDA, respectively. In scope of monitoring in 600×600 m2 and the fault rate of 25%, the hardware cost of CDM is only 20% for DFDM. In Scope of monitoring in 200×200 m2 and the fault rate of 25%, the hardware cost of CDM is only 17% of cost for DFDM. Chiu-ching Tuan 段裘慶 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 100 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 電腦與通訊研究所 === 98 === In Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (WSAN), when the power of sensor nodes is insufficient or wireless communications and deployment environment become unstable, the sensed data may lose in the way to the destination. Therefore, how to design an efficient fault tolerance mechanism becomes an important issue in WSAN. However, the existing fault-tolerant mechanisms are mostly concentrated on the routing link error handling. That is, research for error sensing data is little. When sensor nodes may sense inaccurately or invalidly, the error sensing data will cause the actuator to make error response and handling. Therefore, this paper proposed a Clustering Detection Method (CDM) based on WSAN. This method use the discrete degree of sensing data to judge the correctness by ruling out the error sensor nodes. CDM also can combine with routing link fault tolerant mechanism to construct a complete fault tolerance mechanism. In performance analysis, we compare CDM with Distributed Fault Detection Method (DFDM), and define three metrics: Faulty Sensor Detection Accuracy (FSDA), False Alarm Rate (FAR), Monitoring Scope and Sensor Nodes Relationship (MSSNR) for measuring the performance of CDM and DFDM. From the simulation results, when the average neighbor of nodes 7, CDM was better than DFDM by 28% on the FAR, by 37% on the FSDA, respectively. When the average neighbor of nodes is 20, CDM was better than DFDM by 10% on the FAR, by 19% on the FSDA, respectively. In scope of monitoring in 600×600 m2 and the fault rate of 25%, the hardware cost of CDM is only 20% for DFDM. In Scope of monitoring in 200×200 m2 and the fault rate of 25%, the hardware cost of CDM is only 17% of cost for DFDM.
author2 Chiu-ching Tuan
author_facet Chiu-ching Tuan
Chien-Hsing Chung
鍾見興
author Chien-Hsing Chung
鍾見興
spellingShingle Chien-Hsing Chung
鍾見興
Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
author_sort Chien-Hsing Chung
title Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
title_short Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
title_full Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
title_fullStr Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
title_full_unstemmed Fault Tolerance by Using Clustering Detection in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
title_sort fault tolerance by using clustering detection in wireless sensor and actuator networks
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/4559zq
work_keys_str_mv AT chienhsingchung faulttolerancebyusingclusteringdetectioninwirelesssensorandactuatornetworks
AT zhōngjiànxìng faulttolerancebyusingclusteringdetectioninwirelesssensorandactuatornetworks
AT chienhsingchung wúxiànchuángǎnqìwǎnglùzhīcóngjízhēncèfǎróngcuòjīzhì
AT zhōngjiànxìng wúxiànchuángǎnqìwǎnglùzhīcóngjízhēncèfǎróngcuòjīzhì
_version_ 1719101421305987072