Tragedy vs. Farce: Maurice Meisner''s Historiographic Indecision on Maoist/Chinese Socialism and Its Aftermath
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 政治學研究所 === 98 === Marx once said, all great world-historic facts and personages appear twice: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. Does the history of the People’s Republic of China repeat the history of the Soviet and just be a farce? Or, is it a unique one to the...
Main Authors: | Wei-ting Syu, 許韋婷 |
---|---|
Other Authors: | 石之瑜 |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67756891132432250815 |
Similar Items
-
Marxist Rebellion in the Age of Neo-Liberal Globalization: FARC and the Naxalite-Maoists in Comparison
Published: (2014) -
Women in conflict, peacebuilding and reconstruction: Insights from the aftermath of Nepal's Maoist insurgency
by: Ramnarain, Smita
Published: (2012) -
Meeting Sanford Meisner: An Investigation of the Origins, Development, and Practical Application of the Meisner Technique
by: Butler, Mandy
Published: (2011) -
Maurice Meisner. Li Ta-chao and the origins of Chinese Marxism. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1967. xvii, 326 p.
by: Lothar Knauth
Published: (1969-01-01) -
The Korea Journal Sino-Soviet Affairs''China Studies:Anti-communism and Its Aftermath
by: Min-Young Lee, et al.
Published: (2012)