Life Cycle Assessment of Heat Pump-Considerations of Heat Source and Heat Sink

• Main Authors: Liou, shu- hong, 劉書宏
• Other Authors: LEE, Yuh-Ming
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2010
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/44646227381996300592

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 自然資源與環境管理研究所 === 98 === Taiwan depended on fossil fuel as its main using energy for a long time, resulting the Greenhouse gases remained a huge number, and the regeneration cycle of fossil fuel was very long time, almost could as it was a non-renewable energy, so there is a problem how should we reduce the demand of fossil fuel, and developing the appropriate energy of natural resource will be a important step of sustainability with Taiwan. This research’s target referenced the energy using statistics value of real exist building, calculated the target’s carrying capacity of air conditioning and hot water, there are seven cases in research, the case 1 is target’s original statistics value, the other are scenarios, the result of the case 2(all the air condition get exchanged with GSHPs)have the best performance with the energy input, reduction of CO2 emission and the energy costs in using phase, Otherwise the case 3 is the worst in every scenarios, but comparing with the case 1, it’s still has a nice performance and advantage, but the CO2 emission is more than the case 1. To compare with the case 1, the ranges of reduction of energy input in using phase is between 69,747~123,082GJ; the ranges of reduction of CO2 emission in using phase is between 2,429~11,662Mt, the ranges of energy costs in using phase is between 52~86M. The Payment of energy with the case 2, case 2a and case 2b are 0.11y, 0.10y, 0.16y; The Payment of CO2 emission are 0.08y, 0.10y, 0.12y.