The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 資訊管理研究所 === 98 === The intellectual structure is a widely used method to facilitate the comprehension of the important research topics and their inter-relationships in a knowledge domain. The intellectual structure building process derives the structure utilizing the factor analysi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99856904449353095088 |
id |
ndltd-TW-098NTPU0396008 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-098NTPU03960082015-10-13T18:21:45Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99856904449353095088 The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis 以共引為基礎應用因素轉軸之比較與驗證 Wu Ming Yang 吳明陽 碩士 國立臺北大學 資訊管理研究所 98 The intellectual structure is a widely used method to facilitate the comprehension of the important research topics and their inter-relationships in a knowledge domain. The intellectual structure building process derives the structure utilizing the factor analysis, and the orthogonal rotation of axes used by the Varimax is the most commonly used option in the factor analysis. However, the assumption of applying the orthogonal rotation method is the factors are independent of each other. This factor independence assumption is against our observation in the past since the topics in a research field are related to each other. We therefore apply the oblique rotation method used by Promax, which does not assume the independence among factors. This study compares the factors derived from these two methods in terms of several indicators and the visual effect. The preliminary results indicate that the factors derived from the orthogonal rotation and oblique rotation provide complementary information. To validate the intellectual structure derived by our study, we take the classification results given by an IS field expert’s as the benchmark for comparison. In addition, we also use the classification results derived by another analyst on the same dataset from another study as an additional support. Cronbach's α value is calculated to test the internal consistency of factors. Chen Tsung Teng 陳宗天 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 71 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 資訊管理研究所 === 98 === The intellectual structure is a widely used method to facilitate the comprehension
of the important research topics and their inter-relationships in a knowledge domain.
The intellectual structure building process derives the structure utilizing the factor
analysis, and the orthogonal rotation of axes used by the Varimax is the most
commonly used option in the factor analysis. However, the assumption of applying
the orthogonal rotation method is the factors are independent of each other. This
factor independence assumption is against our observation in the past since the topics
in a research field are related to each other. We therefore apply the oblique rotation
method used by Promax, which does not assume the independence among factors.
This study compares the factors derived from these two methods in terms of
several indicators and the visual effect. The preliminary results indicate that the
factors derived from the orthogonal rotation and oblique rotation provide
complementary information.
To validate the intellectual structure derived by our study, we take the
classification results given by an IS field expert’s as the benchmark for comparison. In
addition, we also use the classification results derived by another analyst on the same
dataset from another study as an additional support. Cronbach's α value is calculated
to test the internal consistency of factors.
|
author2 |
Chen Tsung Teng |
author_facet |
Chen Tsung Teng Wu Ming Yang 吳明陽 |
author |
Wu Ming Yang 吳明陽 |
spellingShingle |
Wu Ming Yang 吳明陽 The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis |
author_sort |
Wu Ming Yang |
title |
The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis |
title_short |
The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis |
title_full |
The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis |
title_fullStr |
The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Comparison And Validation - Using Factor Rotation Method Base On Co-Citation Analysis |
title_sort |
comparison and validation - using factor rotation method base on co-citation analysis |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/99856904449353095088 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wumingyang thecomparisonandvalidationusingfactorrotationmethodbaseoncocitationanalysis AT wúmíngyáng thecomparisonandvalidationusingfactorrotationmethodbaseoncocitationanalysis AT wumingyang yǐgòngyǐnwèijīchǔyīngyòngyīnsùzhuǎnzhóuzhībǐjiàoyǔyànzhèng AT wúmíngyáng yǐgòngyǐnwèijīchǔyīngyòngyīnsùzhuǎnzhóuzhībǐjiàoyǔyànzhèng AT wumingyang comparisonandvalidationusingfactorrotationmethodbaseoncocitationanalysis AT wúmíngyáng comparisonandvalidationusingfactorrotationmethodbaseoncocitationanalysis |
_version_ |
1718032362076372992 |