| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系在職進修碩士班 === 98 === The purpose of this study was to explore the factors of leisure participation and barriers among senior and vocational high school teachers in Yilan County, and to explore the differences between leisure participation and barriers based on various backgrounds variables. Questionnaires survey was the way for material gathering of the research. The qualified senior and vocational high school teachers in Yilan were the main targets, and questioned by the survey devised as “Questionnaire on Yilan Senior and Vocational High School Teachers Participating in Leisure Activities and Barriers”. A total of 500 questionnaires were sent and there were 416 valid samples. The response rate of valid questionnaires was 84%. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests (Scheffe Method). The significance standard of the research was set smaller than .05. The results were shown as follows:
1.The most taken styles of the participation in leisure for Yilan senior and vocational high school teachers in sequence were: “entertainment”, “knowledge”, “social service”, “sports”, “outdoor leisure”, and “hobbies”. The top five leisure activities were: watching TV at home, reading, listening to music, surfing the Internet and going shopping.
2.The intensity of leisure barriers for Yilan senior and vocational high school teachers in sequence were: “structural barriers”, “social barriers”, “personal external barriers”, and “personal internal barriers”. The factors of leisure barriers in sequence were: climate, timing, facilities, fully occupied and the limits of opening time.
3.The senior and vocational high school teachers in Yilan County with different background variables showed significant differences in styles of leisure activities.
4.The senior and vocational high school teachers in Yilan County with different background variables on genders, age, seniority and marriage status showed significant differences in leisure barriers, but with the different background variables on positions and financial situation, there was no significant difference.
|
|---|
