On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease

碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 哲學研究所 === 98 === Abstract In this thesis I investigate the conception of “disease”. What is the nature of the conception of “disease” ? Is the conception of “disease” value-free or value-laden? Christopher Boorse is a naturalist. Boorse thinks that the conception of “disease” is a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Yi-Fang, 陳儀芳
Other Authors: Cheng, Hsi-Heng
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/29840249675208337529
id ndltd-TW-098NTHU5259003
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098NTHU52590032016-04-25T04:27:13Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/29840249675208337529 On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease 論「疾病」觀念的兩個進路:自然主義和實用論 Chen, Yi-Fang 陳儀芳 碩士 國立清華大學 哲學研究所 98 Abstract In this thesis I investigate the conception of “disease”. What is the nature of the conception of “disease” ? Is the conception of “disease” value-free or value-laden? Christopher Boorse is a naturalist. Boorse thinks that the conception of “disease” is a purely theoretical, descriptive conception. Consequently, Boorse has taken the theoretical approach to analyzing the concept of “disease”. One who takes the theoretical approach focuses on the theoretical aspect of the conception of “disease”. In contrast, George J. Agich adopts a pragmatic approach to the conception of “disease”. Agich claims that the conception of “disease” is in its nature a practical concept and thus value-laden. Agich thinks the conception of “disease” is directly related to the practical concepts of “illness” and “sickness”. The conception of “disease” is cultivated in practice. Thus, we should use a pragmatic approach to the conception of “disease”. There are apparent conflicts between Boorse’s and Agich’s theories. However, once Boorse’s conception of “disease” and Agich’s conception of “disease” are placed on two different levels, the apparent conflicts will disappear. Agich’s pragmatic conception of “disease” should be the basis. Within the framework of the pragmatic conception of “disease”, a variety of descriptive notions of disease concepts can be developed. Boorse’s conception of “disease” is one of such descriptive concepts. The conception of “disease” in alternative medicine which Mark B. Woodhouse explores is another descriptive conception of “disease”. Woodhouse argues that the conception of “disease” in alternative medicine is an extension of the conception of “disease” in biomedical medicine. However, as far as I know, some of the physical states biomedical doctors regard as diseases are not diseases at all from the point of view of traditional Chinese medicine. Cheng, Hsi-Heng 鄭喜恆 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 62 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立清華大學 === 哲學研究所 === 98 === Abstract In this thesis I investigate the conception of “disease”. What is the nature of the conception of “disease” ? Is the conception of “disease” value-free or value-laden? Christopher Boorse is a naturalist. Boorse thinks that the conception of “disease” is a purely theoretical, descriptive conception. Consequently, Boorse has taken the theoretical approach to analyzing the concept of “disease”. One who takes the theoretical approach focuses on the theoretical aspect of the conception of “disease”. In contrast, George J. Agich adopts a pragmatic approach to the conception of “disease”. Agich claims that the conception of “disease” is in its nature a practical concept and thus value-laden. Agich thinks the conception of “disease” is directly related to the practical concepts of “illness” and “sickness”. The conception of “disease” is cultivated in practice. Thus, we should use a pragmatic approach to the conception of “disease”. There are apparent conflicts between Boorse’s and Agich’s theories. However, once Boorse’s conception of “disease” and Agich’s conception of “disease” are placed on two different levels, the apparent conflicts will disappear. Agich’s pragmatic conception of “disease” should be the basis. Within the framework of the pragmatic conception of “disease”, a variety of descriptive notions of disease concepts can be developed. Boorse’s conception of “disease” is one of such descriptive concepts. The conception of “disease” in alternative medicine which Mark B. Woodhouse explores is another descriptive conception of “disease”. Woodhouse argues that the conception of “disease” in alternative medicine is an extension of the conception of “disease” in biomedical medicine. However, as far as I know, some of the physical states biomedical doctors regard as diseases are not diseases at all from the point of view of traditional Chinese medicine.
author2 Cheng, Hsi-Heng
author_facet Cheng, Hsi-Heng
Chen, Yi-Fang
陳儀芳
author Chen, Yi-Fang
陳儀芳
spellingShingle Chen, Yi-Fang
陳儀芳
On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease
author_sort Chen, Yi-Fang
title On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease
title_short On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease
title_full On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease
title_fullStr On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease
title_full_unstemmed On the Naturalistic and Pragmatic Approaches to the Notion of Disease
title_sort on the naturalistic and pragmatic approaches to the notion of disease
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/29840249675208337529
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyifang onthenaturalisticandpragmaticapproachestothenotionofdisease
AT chényífāng onthenaturalisticandpragmaticapproachestothenotionofdisease
AT chenyifang lùnjíbìngguānniàndeliǎnggèjìnlùzìránzhǔyìhéshíyònglùn
AT chényífāng lùnjíbìngguānniàndeliǎnggèjìnlùzìránzhǔyìhéshíyònglùn
_version_ 1718232800330514432