A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept
博士 === 高雄師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 98 === Focusing on the polysemy of gene concepts, this study explores high school students’ understanding of gene concepts, the application and integration of various gene concepts and thereby constructs an assessment framework that may be helpful for both teachers...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/03841384569085388193 |
id |
ndltd-TW-098NKNU5231012 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-098NKNU52310122015-10-13T18:25:50Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/03841384569085388193 A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept 多義性基因概念的理解與評量之研究 王敏男 博士 高雄師範大學 科學教育研究所 98 Focusing on the polysemy of gene concepts, this study explores high school students’ understanding of gene concepts, the application and integration of various gene concepts and thereby constructs an assessment framework that may be helpful for both teachers and students. In the study, 1551 junior high school students and 1262 senior high school students from Kaohsiung City were chosen by means of purposive sampling and given the Gene Concept Assessment Questionnaire. In addition, 36 senior high students on the third grade, who had completed their high school genetics courses, were given semi-structured interviews and were asked to draw a concept map for gene concepts. The main conclusions of this study are as follows. I.In terms of the understanding of gene concepts, senior high school students performed better than their junior high counterparts. For senior high, students on the third grade did better than those on the first and second grades. For junior high, however, no significant differences were observed among students of different grades. II.Various gene concepts are arranged in order of comprehension difficulty they pose for students, starting from the least difficult one. 1.Gene concept classification adapted from Falk (1986): instrumental gene, material gene, expressing gene, and regulative gene. 2.Gene concept classification based on ontology: process versus matter. 3.Gene concept classification based on genetics: tranditional genetics versus modern genetics. III.The assessment framework involves: 1.Concepts diversity: concepts richness and concepts evenness 2.Concept application ability 3.Summary index IV.Students process new gene concepts through assimilation and accommodation. V.In solving a problem, students may choose particular gene concepts out of various considerations. 黃台珠 博士 廖麗貞 博士 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 153 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
博士 === 高雄師範大學 === 科學教育研究所 === 98 === Focusing on the polysemy of gene concepts, this study explores high school students’ understanding of gene concepts, the application and integration of various gene concepts and thereby constructs an assessment framework that may be helpful for both teachers and students. In the study, 1551 junior high school students and 1262 senior high school students from Kaohsiung City were chosen by means of purposive sampling and given the Gene Concept Assessment Questionnaire. In addition, 36 senior high students on the third grade, who had completed their high school genetics courses, were given semi-structured interviews and were asked to draw a concept map for gene concepts. The main conclusions of this study are as follows.
I.In terms of the understanding of gene concepts, senior high school students performed better than their junior high counterparts. For senior high, students on the third grade did better than those on the first and second grades. For junior high, however, no significant differences were observed among students of different grades.
II.Various gene concepts are arranged in order of comprehension difficulty they pose for students, starting from the least difficult one.
1.Gene concept classification adapted from Falk (1986): instrumental gene, material gene, expressing gene, and regulative gene.
2.Gene concept classification based on ontology: process versus matter.
3.Gene concept classification based on genetics: tranditional genetics versus modern genetics.
III.The assessment framework involves:
1.Concepts diversity: concepts richness and concepts evenness
2.Concept application ability
3.Summary index
IV.Students process new gene concepts through assimilation and accommodation.
V.In solving a problem, students may choose particular gene concepts out of various considerations.
|
author2 |
黃台珠 博士 |
author_facet |
黃台珠 博士 王敏男 |
author |
王敏男 |
spellingShingle |
王敏男 A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept |
author_sort |
王敏男 |
title |
A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept |
title_short |
A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept |
title_full |
A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept |
title_fullStr |
A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study on the Understanding and Assessment of the Polysemic Gene Concept |
title_sort |
study on the understanding and assessment of the polysemic gene concept |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/03841384569085388193 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wángmǐnnán astudyontheunderstandingandassessmentofthepolysemicgeneconcept AT wángmǐnnán duōyìxìngjīyīngàiniàndelǐjiěyǔpíngliàngzhīyánjiū AT wángmǐnnán studyontheunderstandingandassessmentofthepolysemicgeneconcept |
_version_ |
1718032885096644608 |