The Study of Corporation’s Intellectual Property Establishment

• Main Authors: Cheng-Chun Chou, 周政春
• Other Authors: Scott S.C. Lung
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2010
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/34703524785409544492

碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 企業管理研究所 === 98 === During the progress of pursuing the achievement for high innovation technology, to create the market with new blue sea strategy, enterprise will certainly technological development obstacle inevitably. Therefore, enterprise must handle accusation for technology or patent carefully, and the possibility of operation risks. Consequently, the importance of patent system and IP management operation should be higher than before relatively. Most current research and symposiums are focusing on the behavior of enterprises’ adjustment as patent or IP issue occurred, but seldom deeply analysis about whether the management system or operation will be changed or not. Especially, there is no reference information about the attitude change. Since it is hard to get the information, and enterprises are always not willing to disclosure the attitude change when property issue happened, so the relative research is very poor. This study primarily focuses on the different analysis of patent regulation and IP management of enterprise before and after being claimed. By utilizing the way of questionnaire survey and interview, there are six factors for the difference analysis that can be summarized in this study, including “Patent System Operation Ability”, “Patent Management Intensity”, “Patent Working Strength and Combination Plan”, “Patent Evasion Plan”, “Patent Innovation Change Ability” and “Open Style Innovation Management”. Questionnaire survey is used as a research method for this study. The conclusion is, enterprise which being claimed for patent will request for improvement much stronger than before, especially in the orientations of “Patent System Operation Ability” and “Patent Working Strength and Combination Plan”. But for the operation of “Open Style Innovation Management”, variance is very large. In addition, this study also discusses the patent reward status of business. For bonus, one shot and fixed amount cash should be the most popular. As to honor, public praise is the majority. Moreover, if the department of IP management belongs to department of legal, then the former will lack of support including technical management, evasion design and patent map. Therefore, the recommendation of this study is that IP management department should belong to R&D. It will greatly improve the service.