| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 教練研究所 === 98 === The study aimed at four purposes. First, it testified whether Paternalistic leadership can be a prediction to motivational climate. Second, it testified whether Paternalistic leadership can predict team trust. Third, it testified whether motivational climate can predict team trust. Fourth, it examined whether motivational climate is the mediating effect between Paternalistic leadership and team trust. Participants came from HBL first 12 female and male teams in 2009. 336 samples were delivered and by eliminating invalid responses, the valid responses summed up to 318. Paternalistic Leadership Questionnaire, PMCSQ, and MSTL were used. The data were examined through descriptive analysis, factor analysis, Pearson correlation, and hierarchical regression. The results were as follows: First, coaches’ authoritarian leadership and moral leadership had significantly effective prediction to the motivational climate; authoritarian leadership had negative prediction to ego-oriented motivational climate. Second, benevolence leadership and moral leadership had significantly effective prediction to team trust; authoritarian leadership had negative prediction to team trust. Third, task-oriented motivational climate had positive prediction to team trust; ego-oriented motivational climate had negative outcome. Fourth, motivational climate is a mediator between paternalistic leadership and team trust. The results were discussed and suggestions were made for future study and applications.
Key words: Paternalistic leadership, motivational climate, team trust
|
|---|
