A Study of the Positive and Negative Caregiving Experience among Primary Caregivers of Patients Receiving Home Nursing Care and its Related Factors

• Main Authors: Chia-Li Hsiao, 蕭佳莉
• Other Authors: Chii-Jun Chiou
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2010
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/53940340769760412077

碩士 === 高雄醫學大學 === 護理學研究所 === 98 === The purpose of this study were (1) to explore the primary caregivers to take care of the positive and negative experiences; (2) to explore the main caregivers to take care of the positive and negative experiences of the important predictors. Cross-sectional, descriptive correlational design to receive health insurance home care patients the primary caregivers for the study, a structured questionnaire, the use of medical centers and regional hospitals attached to the type of home care by a total income of all Case 120. The questionnaire included: primary caregiver personal attributes, health status, family functioning diseases and disease conditions, to take care of reaction scale, which scales to take care of reactions were measured to take care of the positive and negative experiences. Scale reliability and validity by the test, including the internal consistency Cronbach''s α value of .80 ~ .91, expert content validity and face validity. The results showed: (1) study the experience to take care of the average score of positive 3.71 ± 0.60, a negative experience to take care of the average score of 2.60 ± 0.42, shown on the provision of patient care, their positive and negative feel to the experience of care ; (2) positive care experience, the highest score for the "I really want to care for the patient"; to "I complain to take care of the patient" and the lowest scores; (3) to take care of negative experience with "timing" with the highest scores; the lowest scores for the "lack of family support"e care of negative experience with "timing" the highest average score, on the lowest scores was "lack of family support"; (4) positive experiences in taking care of the significant predictors followed by health, family functioning, and the patient''s emotional relationship, a total of 26.6% of the variance explained; (5) negative experiences in taking care of the important predictors of health status was followed by a week to help take care of matters of frequency, 34.0% of the total explained variance.