| Summary: | 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 日本語文學系 === 98 === This thesis makes the four(4) forms, viz., “ba”, “to”, “tara” and “nara”, the targets of investigation with an attempt to contemplate the conditional expression of Japanese language by means of actual example analyses.
This thesis is consisted of five(5) chapters.
This first chapter mainly describes the motive and aim of study, objects and methods of investigation as well as the formation of the paper.
The prime target of Chapter 2 is to study beforehand the proceed of arrangement and raise also the standpoint of this thesis, beginning from the study of “properties and meaning of state of affair fore-and-aft”, mental attitude of “the speakers”, and “point of vision”, altogether three(3) points of view, for arrangement and analysis. Further attempt is being made to lead to the concept of “range of information” from the standpoints of “the speakers”, to cut in through the two viewpoints, the “nature of intervention with the content of state of affair” and the “practicality in outcome of state of affair” trying to think about the assumed conditional expression of Japanese language.
Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 chiefly discuss the subject with two viewpoints, the “nature of intervention with the content of state of affair” and the “practicality in outcome of state of affair” in separated ways to exemplify substantially the contents of novels and articles (written aspect) and content of dialogue of web actual interview (oral aspect), and by means of actual examples, the four(4) forms, “ba”, “to”, “tara”, and “nara” used by “the speakers”, to investigate respectively what are the “nature of intervention with the content of state of affair” and the “practicality in outcome of state of affair” and analyze the strength of “nature of intervention” and variations in degree of altitude of “practicality” among the forms.
Chapter 5 respectively proceeds with the integration and arrangement the analytical results of the “natural of intervention with the content of state of affair” and the “practicality in outcome of state of affair”, and probes into the relation between the “nature of intervention” and the “practicality” in anticipation of the possibility to suggest implements for teaching and references to utilization with additional description of subjects for study hereafter.
|
|---|
