National Land for Priority Evaluation in Hypothesis surface rights-A CaseStudy in Taichung City and County

碩士 === 逢甲大學 === 環境資訊科技碩士學位學程 === 98 === For increasing the state revenue, public land has been disposed mostly by selling for long time. Besides financial purpose, the development of public land should also play a role on city growth and the demand and supply of real estate. In reality, the authorit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuan-Wu wu, 吳宣武
Other Authors: Tien-Yin,Chou
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00332903534611057276
Description
Summary:碩士 === 逢甲大學 === 環境資訊科技碩士學位學程 === 98 === For increasing the state revenue, public land has been disposed mostly by selling for long time. Besides financial purpose, the development of public land should also play a role on city growth and the demand and supply of real estate. In reality, the authorities usually rely on their experience and conventional ways when choosing the approaches of public land development, which ignores the characteristics, utilization intensity, local development, and financial resources of individual property. This research discussed the four approaches-sell by tender, superficies, consigned management and simplified cooperation management- to develop state’s land. By analyzing the four methods, the study established the criteria to assess the best model of land development under the analytic hierarchy process. Two development cases in Taichung City were chosen to show how the model worked and evaluated the individual approach. The findings from the research are as follows:The first level prioritized the indexes as site conditions, financial purposes, development factors. The second level criteria gave the order as future potential, substantial conditions, development revenue, investment effect, management cost, and execution. Thus, the self-condition of the national property, the local real estate market, and the overall future urban planning econamically and socially are the most valued in the development process. General speaking, in the low-developed area, the plan for developing is aimed at its short-term goal. For the highly developed area, the best utilization plan would be a complete long-term one.