Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company

碩士 === 中原大學 === 企業管理研究所 === 98 === In traditional concept, a innovation process is difficult to be systematically formulated as a model. In this study, the innovation process is viewed as the extension of an optimization problem with multiple conflicting objectives. The study adopt the De-Novo of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jheng-Ren Hsu, 許政仁
Other Authors: Yu-Jing Chiu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2010
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/89549986983998956535
id ndltd-TW-098CYCU5121053
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-098CYCU51210532015-10-13T18:44:54Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/89549986983998956535 Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company 由多目標觀點建構創新模式—以LED廠商為例— Jheng-Ren Hsu 許政仁 碩士 中原大學 企業管理研究所 98 In traditional concept, a innovation process is difficult to be systematically formulated as a model. In this study, the innovation process is viewed as the extension of an optimization problem with multiple conflicting objectives. The study adopt the De-Novo of the multi-objective programming means by Zeleny (1986, 1995). The De-Novo can reduce the conflicts among multiple objectives leads to innovation. The study build up a multi-objective programming model by collection the available R&D resources data from R&D department of the LED manufacturer. Evaluated the formula, I acquire a set of compromise solution under the constraints of limited resource. Based on Chen (2004), he introduces technological progress into De-Novo. This study verify that multiple R&D objectives could be simultaneously optimized without trade-off under the constraints of limited resource if more financial supports are added. A traditional multi-objective programming problem is generally implemented as follows: (a) define the decision variables and objectives of a problem, (b) specify the constraints of this problem, and (c) select an appropriate method to solve the problem so that compromised solutions are available to the decision maker. However, the compromised solutions should not be viewed as the completion of the multi-objective programming approach – they are just the short-term equilibrium of the problem. The solution by De-Novo is the Mid-term equilibrium as a Incremental innovation. To achieve Radical Innovation (Long-term equilibrium) must consume more resource and time than short-term, Mid-term equilibrium. In this study, this study show the multi-objective problem (innovation process) is eventually a sustainable and dynamic process with three different equilibria. Yu-Jing Chiu 邱榆淨 2010 學位論文 ; thesis 52 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中原大學 === 企業管理研究所 === 98 === In traditional concept, a innovation process is difficult to be systematically formulated as a model. In this study, the innovation process is viewed as the extension of an optimization problem with multiple conflicting objectives. The study adopt the De-Novo of the multi-objective programming means by Zeleny (1986, 1995). The De-Novo can reduce the conflicts among multiple objectives leads to innovation. The study build up a multi-objective programming model by collection the available R&D resources data from R&D department of the LED manufacturer. Evaluated the formula, I acquire a set of compromise solution under the constraints of limited resource. Based on Chen (2004), he introduces technological progress into De-Novo. This study verify that multiple R&D objectives could be simultaneously optimized without trade-off under the constraints of limited resource if more financial supports are added. A traditional multi-objective programming problem is generally implemented as follows: (a) define the decision variables and objectives of a problem, (b) specify the constraints of this problem, and (c) select an appropriate method to solve the problem so that compromised solutions are available to the decision maker. However, the compromised solutions should not be viewed as the completion of the multi-objective programming approach – they are just the short-term equilibrium of the problem. The solution by De-Novo is the Mid-term equilibrium as a Incremental innovation. To achieve Radical Innovation (Long-term equilibrium) must consume more resource and time than short-term, Mid-term equilibrium. In this study, this study show the multi-objective problem (innovation process) is eventually a sustainable and dynamic process with three different equilibria.
author2 Yu-Jing Chiu
author_facet Yu-Jing Chiu
Jheng-Ren Hsu
許政仁
author Jheng-Ren Hsu
許政仁
spellingShingle Jheng-Ren Hsu
許政仁
Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company
author_sort Jheng-Ren Hsu
title Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company
title_short Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company
title_full Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company
title_fullStr Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Objective Programming for Constructing the Innovation Model: The Case of A LED Company
title_sort multi-objective programming for constructing the innovation model: the case of a led company
publishDate 2010
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/89549986983998956535
work_keys_str_mv AT jhengrenhsu multiobjectiveprogrammingforconstructingtheinnovationmodelthecaseofaledcompany
AT xǔzhèngrén multiobjectiveprogrammingforconstructingtheinnovationmodelthecaseofaledcompany
AT jhengrenhsu yóuduōmùbiāoguāndiǎnjiàngòuchuàngxīnmóshìyǐledchǎngshāngwèilì
AT xǔzhèngrén yóuduōmùbiāoguāndiǎnjiàngòuchuàngxīnmóshìyǐledchǎngshāngwèilì
_version_ 1718036093418340352