| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 犯罪防治所 === 98 === Abstract
The purpose of this study is to show the current condition of how domestic protective control measures being carried out in a juvenile probation officer’s point of view. Also, to realize the advantage as well as the obstruction a uvenile probation officer should face, propose the suggestion of how to make current protective control measure system be better. During the research, the researcher used qualitative research method to have interviews with eight juvenile probation officers, the main content of the interveiws can be devided into three parts: The first part is working condition of juvenile protective control, in supervising term and counselling term; the second part is to know further about the mutual action happened between juvenile probation officer and the protected juvenile; the third part is to realize the difficulties of the juvenile probation officer.
There are nineteen results came up with the interveiws. The main finding out is that there are still great space for juvenile probation officer to improve when they are carrying out the protective control measures, the measure has it’s own high independency. But the insufficient sharing of probation officers’ experience and resource has shortened the possibility of helping the juveniles. I’ve presented eight solutions as follows:
1. To reduce the case loading by increasing the number of probation officers.
2. To increase the safety device when visiting the juveniles, such as to establish system of policeman accompanying.
3. To increase the fund and information of juvenile allocation.
4. To increase the accessible probation officers’ width when counselling difficulties happens.
5. To set up the system of supervising, but the assessment of supervising is still need to be estimated.
6. To adjust the elasticity of new regulation by thinking of the restriction of protective control measures.
7. To establish the official website for the resource allocation of probation officers.
8. To increase the accessibilty of experience sharing of probation officers.
|
|---|
