操弄論證及其回應：一個相容論者的新方案

• Main Authors: Chu, Chia-An, 朱家安
• Other Authors: Wang, Linton
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2011
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87113994488044831400

碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 哲學研究所 === 100 === This thesis concerns the compatibility between moral responsibility and determinism. It concentrates on responding to the manipulation arguments raised by the incompatibilists for the incompatibility of moral responsibility and determinism. In this thesis I first introduce and discuss the main theories in the compatibilists camp, and then various manipulation arguments from incompatibilists. Afterwards, I examine two kinds of compatibilists’ reply to the manipulation arguments, the soft-line reply and the hard-line reply. I argue that none of them provide satisfactory explanations to the intuitions in support the manipulation arguments. Finally, I propose an alternative soft-line reply. I explain how this reply offers appropriate explanation for our intuition about moral responsibility in cases introduced from the manipulation arguments, and how it helps compatibilist theories in responding to the manipulation arguments.