Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index

碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 環境與安全工程系碩士班 === 97 === Ground-based air quality observations were set up traditionally in accordance-populated area. It could only sample at single location with operation and maintenance. Nowadays, remote sensing technology has been widely applied to monitor air environment, thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guang-Ray Tsai, 蔡廣叡
Other Authors: Jao-Jia Horng
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51538024122905409343
id ndltd-TW-097YUNT5633056
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-097YUNT56330562016-04-29T04:19:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51538024122905409343 Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index 可攜式高光譜影像儀應用於遙測空氣品質指標 Guang-Ray Tsai 蔡廣叡 碩士 國立雲林科技大學 環境與安全工程系碩士班 97 Ground-based air quality observations were set up traditionally in accordance-populated area. It could only sample at single location with operation and maintenance. Nowadays, remote sensing technology has been widely applied to monitor air environment, this research is intended to develop a portable hyperspectral camera (HyCAM-I) to monitor air Pollutant Standard Index (PSI) remothly and flexibly. With the establishment of air quality prediction model from the hyperspectral data and PSIhr, we can measure a regional air quality promptly by mobile HyCAM-I rathen than the traditional site-specific monitoring data. For building up the air quality prediction model, this study adopted Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR) models to analysis the measured hyperspectral data and air quality index. Three bands of 500nm, 550nm and 600nm were used as the input variables to estimate output of the PSIhr. The learning results have shown that the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) the samples were 6 and 10 respectively for SVR and MLR, and the MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) were 8% and 14%. The uncertainty analysis with random cross- validation (CV) indicated that the estimation of the average RMSE of validations were 12 and 10, and the average MAPE of validations were 20% and 17%, respectively. In general, the results have shown that the SVR model have better estimation than that of over-learning MLR. However, the validation results did not prove the whole advantage of SVR model whereas the MLR model has better and more stable validations. Conclusionly, The prediction errors of the MLR model were acceptable but need to be verified by improving hyperspectral device and by expanding sample numbers to enhance the reliability. Jao-Jia Horng 洪肇嘉 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 146 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立雲林科技大學 === 環境與安全工程系碩士班 === 97 === Ground-based air quality observations were set up traditionally in accordance-populated area. It could only sample at single location with operation and maintenance. Nowadays, remote sensing technology has been widely applied to monitor air environment, this research is intended to develop a portable hyperspectral camera (HyCAM-I) to monitor air Pollutant Standard Index (PSI) remothly and flexibly. With the establishment of air quality prediction model from the hyperspectral data and PSIhr, we can measure a regional air quality promptly by mobile HyCAM-I rathen than the traditional site-specific monitoring data. For building up the air quality prediction model, this study adopted Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR) models to analysis the measured hyperspectral data and air quality index. Three bands of 500nm, 550nm and 600nm were used as the input variables to estimate output of the PSIhr. The learning results have shown that the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) the samples were 6 and 10 respectively for SVR and MLR, and the MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) were 8% and 14%. The uncertainty analysis with random cross- validation (CV) indicated that the estimation of the average RMSE of validations were 12 and 10, and the average MAPE of validations were 20% and 17%, respectively. In general, the results have shown that the SVR model have better estimation than that of over-learning MLR. However, the validation results did not prove the whole advantage of SVR model whereas the MLR model has better and more stable validations. Conclusionly, The prediction errors of the MLR model were acceptable but need to be verified by improving hyperspectral device and by expanding sample numbers to enhance the reliability.
author2 Jao-Jia Horng
author_facet Jao-Jia Horng
Guang-Ray Tsai
蔡廣叡
author Guang-Ray Tsai
蔡廣叡
spellingShingle Guang-Ray Tsai
蔡廣叡
Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
author_sort Guang-Ray Tsai
title Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
title_short Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
title_full Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
title_fullStr Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
title_full_unstemmed Developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
title_sort developing a portable hyperspectral camera to monitor air quality index
publishDate 2009
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/51538024122905409343
work_keys_str_mv AT guangraytsai developingaportablehyperspectralcameratomonitorairqualityindex
AT càiguǎngruì developingaportablehyperspectralcameratomonitorairqualityindex
AT guangraytsai kěxiéshìgāoguāngpǔyǐngxiàngyíyīngyòngyúyáocèkōngqìpǐnzhìzhǐbiāo
AT càiguǎngruì kěxiéshìgāoguāngpǔyǐngxiàngyíyīngyòngyúyáocèkōngqìpǐnzhìzhǐbiāo
_version_ 1718251342986739712