The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 美國研究所碩士班 === 97 === Prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States endeavored to smooth over problems between Japan and the U.S. Basically, Japan’s “southward policy” conflicted with America’s foreign policy. The Roosevelt Administration maintained what I call “postpo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian-Bang Zeng, 曾建邦
Other Authors: 陳ㄧ新
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87565555048037445642
id ndltd-TW-097TKU05232004
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-097TKU052320042015-10-13T16:13:30Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87565555048037445642 The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor 珍珠港事件前美日對峙之決策過程 Jian-Bang Zeng 曾建邦 碩士 淡江大學 美國研究所碩士班 97 Prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States endeavored to smooth over problems between Japan and the U.S. Basically, Japan’s “southward policy” conflicted with America’s foreign policy. The Roosevelt Administration maintained what I call “postponement policy” and hoped to defer the hostilities. In the end, the U.S. still could not stop the hostilities at the expense of its own national interests. Therefore, the main purpose of this thesis is to explore the decision-making process of the Roosevelt Administration prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor. This thesis is under the framework of Graham Allison’s three decision-making models, namely, Rational Actor Model (RAM), Organizational Behavior Model (OBM), and Governmental Politics Model (GPM), from the perspective of the Roosevelt Administration’s national interests, organizational culture and capability, and bureaucratic bargaining. To start with RAM, the Roosevelt Administration needed supporting Britain to resist Germany because the U.S. viewed the European War as its top priority. At the same time, the U.S. endeavored to defer Japan to go to war, and inclined to maintain the status quo in the Far East. As for OBM, Department of State (DOS) and Department of War (DOW) had different position and opinions due to the unique organizational culture and capabilities. DOS had rich foreign affairs experience and handled the problems with standard operation procedures. In this way, DOS insisted on its position and then could not achieve the breakthrough in the U.S.-Japan talks. Besides, DOW only offered limited military strength to the Fast East because of insufficient military force. Accordingly, DOW was unable to respond the crisis timely in the Pacific. With regard to GPM, President Roosevelt insisted a postponement policy must be maintained between the U.S. and Japan, having no desire to take military action against Japan. Hence, the U.S. only strived for time and hoped to prevent Japan from going to war. Consequently, the U.S. maintained a conversation with Japan, and deferred the bilateral hostilities to escalate as possible as it could, but eventually it could not but go to the Pacific War after the Pearl Harbor was attacked. 陳ㄧ新 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 164 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 美國研究所碩士班 === 97 === Prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States endeavored to smooth over problems between Japan and the U.S. Basically, Japan’s “southward policy” conflicted with America’s foreign policy. The Roosevelt Administration maintained what I call “postponement policy” and hoped to defer the hostilities. In the end, the U.S. still could not stop the hostilities at the expense of its own national interests. Therefore, the main purpose of this thesis is to explore the decision-making process of the Roosevelt Administration prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor. This thesis is under the framework of Graham Allison’s three decision-making models, namely, Rational Actor Model (RAM), Organizational Behavior Model (OBM), and Governmental Politics Model (GPM), from the perspective of the Roosevelt Administration’s national interests, organizational culture and capability, and bureaucratic bargaining. To start with RAM, the Roosevelt Administration needed supporting Britain to resist Germany because the U.S. viewed the European War as its top priority. At the same time, the U.S. endeavored to defer Japan to go to war, and inclined to maintain the status quo in the Far East. As for OBM, Department of State (DOS) and Department of War (DOW) had different position and opinions due to the unique organizational culture and capabilities. DOS had rich foreign affairs experience and handled the problems with standard operation procedures. In this way, DOS insisted on its position and then could not achieve the breakthrough in the U.S.-Japan talks. Besides, DOW only offered limited military strength to the Fast East because of insufficient military force. Accordingly, DOW was unable to respond the crisis timely in the Pacific. With regard to GPM, President Roosevelt insisted a postponement policy must be maintained between the U.S. and Japan, having no desire to take military action against Japan. Hence, the U.S. only strived for time and hoped to prevent Japan from going to war. Consequently, the U.S. maintained a conversation with Japan, and deferred the bilateral hostilities to escalate as possible as it could, but eventually it could not but go to the Pacific War after the Pearl Harbor was attacked.
author2 陳ㄧ新
author_facet 陳ㄧ新
Jian-Bang Zeng
曾建邦
author Jian-Bang Zeng
曾建邦
spellingShingle Jian-Bang Zeng
曾建邦
The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
author_sort Jian-Bang Zeng
title The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
title_short The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
title_full The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
title_fullStr The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
title_full_unstemmed The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
title_sort decision making process of u.s.-japan confrontation prior to the attack of pearl harbor
publishDate 2009
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87565555048037445642
work_keys_str_mv AT jianbangzeng thedecisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor
AT céngjiànbāng thedecisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor
AT jianbangzeng zhēnzhūgǎngshìjiànqiánměirìduìzhìzhījuécèguòchéng
AT céngjiànbāng zhēnzhūgǎngshìjiànqiánměirìduìzhìzhījuécèguòchéng
AT jianbangzeng decisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor
AT céngjiànbāng decisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor
_version_ 1717769184160514048