The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 美國研究所碩士班 === 97 === Prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States endeavored to smooth over problems between Japan and the U.S. Basically, Japan’s “southward policy” conflicted with America’s foreign policy. The Roosevelt Administration maintained what I call “postpo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87565555048037445642 |
id |
ndltd-TW-097TKU05232004 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-097TKU052320042015-10-13T16:13:30Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87565555048037445642 The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor 珍珠港事件前美日對峙之決策過程 Jian-Bang Zeng 曾建邦 碩士 淡江大學 美國研究所碩士班 97 Prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States endeavored to smooth over problems between Japan and the U.S. Basically, Japan’s “southward policy” conflicted with America’s foreign policy. The Roosevelt Administration maintained what I call “postponement policy” and hoped to defer the hostilities. In the end, the U.S. still could not stop the hostilities at the expense of its own national interests. Therefore, the main purpose of this thesis is to explore the decision-making process of the Roosevelt Administration prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor. This thesis is under the framework of Graham Allison’s three decision-making models, namely, Rational Actor Model (RAM), Organizational Behavior Model (OBM), and Governmental Politics Model (GPM), from the perspective of the Roosevelt Administration’s national interests, organizational culture and capability, and bureaucratic bargaining. To start with RAM, the Roosevelt Administration needed supporting Britain to resist Germany because the U.S. viewed the European War as its top priority. At the same time, the U.S. endeavored to defer Japan to go to war, and inclined to maintain the status quo in the Far East. As for OBM, Department of State (DOS) and Department of War (DOW) had different position and opinions due to the unique organizational culture and capabilities. DOS had rich foreign affairs experience and handled the problems with standard operation procedures. In this way, DOS insisted on its position and then could not achieve the breakthrough in the U.S.-Japan talks. Besides, DOW only offered limited military strength to the Fast East because of insufficient military force. Accordingly, DOW was unable to respond the crisis timely in the Pacific. With regard to GPM, President Roosevelt insisted a postponement policy must be maintained between the U.S. and Japan, having no desire to take military action against Japan. Hence, the U.S. only strived for time and hoped to prevent Japan from going to war. Consequently, the U.S. maintained a conversation with Japan, and deferred the bilateral hostilities to escalate as possible as it could, but eventually it could not but go to the Pacific War after the Pearl Harbor was attacked. 陳ㄧ新 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 164 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 美國研究所碩士班 === 97 === Prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the United States endeavored to smooth over problems between Japan and the U.S. Basically, Japan’s “southward policy” conflicted with America’s foreign policy. The Roosevelt Administration maintained what I call “postponement policy” and hoped to defer the hostilities. In the end, the U.S. still could not stop the hostilities at the expense of its own national interests. Therefore, the main purpose of this thesis is to explore the decision-making process of the Roosevelt Administration prior to the attack of Pearl Harbor. This thesis is under the framework of Graham Allison’s three decision-making models, namely, Rational Actor Model (RAM), Organizational Behavior Model (OBM), and Governmental Politics Model (GPM), from the perspective of the Roosevelt Administration’s national interests, organizational culture and capability, and bureaucratic bargaining.
To start with RAM, the Roosevelt Administration needed supporting Britain to resist Germany because the U.S. viewed the European War as its top priority. At the same time, the U.S. endeavored to defer Japan to go to war, and inclined to maintain the status quo in the Far East.
As for OBM, Department of State (DOS) and Department of War (DOW) had different position and opinions due to the unique organizational culture and capabilities. DOS had rich foreign affairs experience and handled the problems with standard operation procedures. In this way, DOS insisted on its position and then could not achieve the breakthrough in the U.S.-Japan talks. Besides, DOW only offered limited military strength to the Fast East because of insufficient military force. Accordingly, DOW was unable to respond the crisis timely in the Pacific.
With regard to GPM, President Roosevelt insisted a postponement policy must be maintained between the U.S. and Japan, having no desire to take military action against Japan. Hence, the U.S. only strived for time and hoped to prevent Japan from going to war.
Consequently, the U.S. maintained a conversation with Japan, and deferred the bilateral hostilities to escalate as possible as it could, but eventually it could not but go to the Pacific War after the Pearl Harbor was attacked.
|
author2 |
陳ㄧ新 |
author_facet |
陳ㄧ新 Jian-Bang Zeng 曾建邦 |
author |
Jian-Bang Zeng 曾建邦 |
spellingShingle |
Jian-Bang Zeng 曾建邦 The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor |
author_sort |
Jian-Bang Zeng |
title |
The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor |
title_short |
The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor |
title_full |
The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor |
title_fullStr |
The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Decision Making Process of U.S.-Japan Confrontation Prior to the Attack of Pearl Harbor |
title_sort |
decision making process of u.s.-japan confrontation prior to the attack of pearl harbor |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87565555048037445642 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jianbangzeng thedecisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor AT céngjiànbāng thedecisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor AT jianbangzeng zhēnzhūgǎngshìjiànqiánměirìduìzhìzhījuécèguòchéng AT céngjiànbāng zhēnzhūgǎngshìjiànqiánměirìduìzhìzhījuécèguòchéng AT jianbangzeng decisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor AT céngjiànbāng decisionmakingprocessofusjapanconfrontationpriortotheattackofpearlharbor |
_version_ |
1717769184160514048 |