The Three Technology Analysis and Comparison of Top Female Table Tennis Athletes between Taiwan and Mainland China－As an Example to Huang Yihua and Zhang Yining－

• Main Authors: Sun Chien-Lan, 孫千嵐
• Other Authors: Shen Chi-Ping
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2009
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/42802090841747987840

碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 運動教練研究所 === 97 === It selected the women’s table tennis national representative --Huang YiHua and the Chinese women's table tennis national representative Zhang Yining as the research object, and collected Hung and Zhang’s technical and tactical information of six competitions, based on the basic technical characteristics of table tennis would be divided into three technical strategies as Serve and Attack stage, Receive and Attack stage, and Rally stage. The description of information statistics Huang and Zhang’s three technical strategies and performance of each strategy in attack and defense during the competitions, and used enter regression analysis to test the impact of Huang and Zhang’s variable scoring rate on the performance in the game. Also tested the match relationship of Hung and Zhang’s each strategy in attack and defense during the competition by separate sample t and paired t test show that：It used the form race three technical indicators to evaluate the empirical models to assess and found Huang’s main scoring technology was in the Serve and Attack stage, the score average was 64% for passing indicators. In Receive and Attack stage, the score average was 37% for failed indicators which is the weak part in strategies, and in the Rally stage, the average is flat rate and 48% was passing indicators; Zhang was outstanding in each three technology strategies, all-round display Zhang. Through stepwise regression analysis to discuss table tennis in three technology strategies performance and the relationship between the winning percentage ,and the results showed that the rate of serve and attack stage , and scoring rate of receive and attack stage, scoring rate of Rally in a stalemate with the game winning percentage showed a positive correlation. Particularly in the rally scoring rate above the value of 0.892 is more than up to the outcome of the key to a stalemate can be seen Huang’s characteristics of the competition. After test to establish the regression equation for the rate of three technology strategies to winning percentage resulted in equation of: Y= -0.035+0.508X3+0.286X1+0.226X2 Using t-test to assess the difference between these two players in the three technology strategies and the result displayed that there’s no difference in this comparison of each stage technology P> 0.5 The reason for this result might be likely to play two very similar or the collection of the two matches against opponents of the difference in strength level. In order to help Huang has more detailed information for reference and training in the future, and the other collection of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games qualifying tournament in the recent match records, detailed analysis the differences between their strategies. And found the largest difference between two player was in the Receive and Attack stage. After Zhange took the initiative to attack defensive board, Huang’s first error ratio was high as 70% above, Huang was still missing points at the rate of loss is as high as 91 percent when she was entering Rally stage after defend, in the other hand, Zhang Yining would be able to take the initiative to attack as long as the score shown the return of serve in Huang’s control and anti-control capability and the lack of defensive ability, so Huang in technical training should serve to strengthen the defense and then a short ball control and the ability of anti-control.