The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 機械工程學研究所 === 97 === Weightings of the evaluation criteria are normally determined by evaluators, which are also important factors influencing results of evaluation. Engineers need to know preference of criteria based on consumer’s viewpoints through weightings. The objective of thi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/44673125091499839201 |
id |
ndltd-TW-097NTU05489002 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-097NTU054890022016-05-09T04:14:02Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/44673125091499839201 The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation 評估權重設定方式之選用分析 Zhen-Lin Wang 王禎麟 碩士 國立臺灣大學 機械工程學研究所 97 Weightings of the evaluation criteria are normally determined by evaluators, which are also important factors influencing results of evaluation. Engineers need to know preference of criteria based on consumer’s viewpoints through weightings. The objective of this research is to find a method to more accurately estimating weightings for evaluation. A standard set of data has been devised in this research for comparing various multiple criteria decision making methods. The comparison shows benefits and drawbacks of each method along with conditions of applications. It concludes that the optimum weight model method is more accurate than others. Weightings also have the properties of changing values over time. Therefore, the time series analysis methods for historical data should be introduced. The autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model was found possessing the properties of better accuracy for near-period weightings, and was more accurate with adequate data. The ARMA model is therefore a better method for estimating the trend weightings in history. 傅增棣 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 87 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 機械工程學研究所 === 97 === Weightings of the evaluation criteria are normally determined by evaluators, which are also important factors influencing results of evaluation. Engineers need to know preference of criteria based on consumer’s viewpoints through weightings. The objective of this research is to find a method to more accurately estimating weightings for evaluation. A standard set of data has been devised in this research for comparing various multiple criteria decision making methods. The comparison shows benefits and drawbacks of each method along with conditions of applications. It concludes that the optimum weight model method is more accurate than others. Weightings also have the properties of changing values over time. Therefore, the time series analysis methods for historical data should be introduced. The autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model was found possessing the properties of better accuracy for near-period weightings, and was more accurate with adequate data. The ARMA model is therefore a better method for estimating the trend weightings in history.
|
author2 |
傅增棣 |
author_facet |
傅增棣 Zhen-Lin Wang 王禎麟 |
author |
Zhen-Lin Wang 王禎麟 |
spellingShingle |
Zhen-Lin Wang 王禎麟 The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation |
author_sort |
Zhen-Lin Wang |
title |
The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation |
title_short |
The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation |
title_full |
The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Selection and Analysis of Weighting Methods for Technical Evaluation |
title_sort |
selection and analysis of weighting methods for technical evaluation |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/44673125091499839201 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zhenlinwang theselectionandanalysisofweightingmethodsfortechnicalevaluation AT wángzhēnlín theselectionandanalysisofweightingmethodsfortechnicalevaluation AT zhenlinwang pínggūquánzhòngshèdìngfāngshìzhīxuǎnyòngfēnxī AT wángzhēnlín pínggūquánzhòngshèdìngfāngshìzhīxuǎnyòngfēnxī AT zhenlinwang selectionandanalysisofweightingmethodsfortechnicalevaluation AT wángzhēnlín selectionandanalysisofweightingmethodsfortechnicalevaluation |
_version_ |
1718263796738293760 |