| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北教育大學 === 教育政策與管理研究所 === 97 === The Integration of Teacher Performance Evaluation System And Teacher Professional Development Evaluation System
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to probe the opinions of elementary school teachers aboout the integration of teacher performance evaluation system（TPES）and teacher professional development evaluation system（TPDES）. It hopes that research results could be taken as references while policy-makers plan a new teacher evaluation system. In order to achieve the goals of the study, questionnaire survey is conducted. The objects are elementary school teachers in Taipei County. It organizes the Questionnaire of the Integration of TPES and TPDES as the research tool of this study. It sends out 460 questionnaires, 378 retrieved, and 373 effective. Methods of data anaylsis include descriptive statistics and Chi-square.The results are as following :
1. The purposes of integrated teacher evaluation system are to raise teachers’ professional image, reinforce teachers’ professional development, and improve teachers’ teaching skills.
2. The contents of integrated teacher evaluation system include the phases of “classroom management and guidance” and “professional attitudes”.
3. The best ways of integrated teacher evaluation system are self-evaluation and peer-evaluation.
4. The proper ways of integrated teacher evaluation system should be filling self- evaluation checklist, classroom observation and peer-evaluation.
5. The most suitable evaluators in integrated teacher evaluation system are school teachers.
6. The cycle of integrated teacher evaluation system should be held every 4 years.
7. Each school should establish the teacher evaluation committee to implement evaluation activity.
8. Teachers who perform well should be awarded special performance bonus.
9. Schools should help teachers who don’t meet the requirement of the evaluation standards.
10. After the integration of TPES and TPDES, it should be put into practice across national wide.
11. To amend teacher law for implementing the integrated teacher evaluation system.
12. To specify teachers’ obligation and performance, it should draft teachers evaluation law, establish mentoring mechamisms and provide suitable packages for implementing the integrated teacher evaluation system.
Finally, the author suggests that policy-makers should take the results of this study as reference when they draw up the integrated teacher evaluation system.
Keywords：teacher performance evaluation system、teacher professional development evaluation system、integration
|
|---|
