Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融研究所 === 97 === Many asset pricing models have been proposed to fit the asset returns in the literature, but few studies discuss the relative performance between them. Non-nested model specification tests provide the econometric tools to compare the performance of many models. O...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v47488 |
id |
ndltd-TW-097NCU05304001 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-097NCU053040012019-05-15T20:32:02Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v47488 Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models 資產定價模型的非巢式檢定 Jin-pon Huang 黃進鵬 碩士 國立中央大學 財務金融研究所 97 Many asset pricing models have been proposed to fit the asset returns in the literature, but few studies discuss the relative performance between them. Non-nested model specification tests provide the econometric tools to compare the performance of many models. Of many asset pricing models, we choose popular Fama-French three factor model, Ferguson and Shockley’s model, Liu’s liquidity-augmented model and Petkova’s model as competing models. The results are different with 25 size- and B/M- sorted returns and 12 industry returns. When using 25 portfolio returns, the result has the pattern that the later proposed model has the better ability to explain the variation on returns. While the 12 industry returns is used, Liu’s liquidityaugmented model tends to be the worst model to fit the returns. Pin-Huang Chou 周賓凰 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 40 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融研究所 === 97 === Many asset pricing models have been proposed to fit the asset returns
in the literature, but few studies discuss the relative performance between
them. Non-nested model specification tests provide the econometric tools to
compare the performance of many models. Of many asset pricing models,
we choose popular Fama-French three factor model, Ferguson and Shockley’s
model, Liu’s liquidity-augmented model and Petkova’s model as competing
models. The results are different with 25 size- and B/M- sorted returns and
12 industry returns. When using 25 portfolio returns, the result has the
pattern that the later proposed model has the better ability to explain the
variation on returns. While the 12 industry returns is used, Liu’s liquidityaugmented
model tends to be the worst model to fit the returns.
|
author2 |
Pin-Huang Chou |
author_facet |
Pin-Huang Chou Jin-pon Huang 黃進鵬 |
author |
Jin-pon Huang 黃進鵬 |
spellingShingle |
Jin-pon Huang 黃進鵬 Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models |
author_sort |
Jin-pon Huang |
title |
Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models |
title_short |
Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models |
title_full |
Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models |
title_fullStr |
Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models |
title_sort |
non-nested tests of asset pricing models |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v47488 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jinponhuang nonnestedtestsofassetpricingmodels AT huángjìnpéng nonnestedtestsofassetpricingmodels AT jinponhuang zīchǎndìngjiàmóxíngdefēicháoshìjiǎndìng AT huángjìnpéng zīchǎndìngjiàmóxíngdefēicháoshìjiǎndìng |
_version_ |
1719099617876901888 |