Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融研究所 === 97 === Many asset pricing models have been proposed to fit the asset returns in the literature, but few studies discuss the relative performance between them. Non-nested model specification tests provide the econometric tools to compare the performance of many models. O...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin-pon Huang, 黃進鵬
Other Authors: Pin-Huang Chou
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v47488
id ndltd-TW-097NCU05304001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-097NCU053040012019-05-15T20:32:02Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v47488 Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models 資產定價模型的非巢式檢定 Jin-pon Huang 黃進鵬 碩士 國立中央大學 財務金融研究所 97 Many asset pricing models have been proposed to fit the asset returns in the literature, but few studies discuss the relative performance between them. Non-nested model specification tests provide the econometric tools to compare the performance of many models. Of many asset pricing models, we choose popular Fama-French three factor model, Ferguson and Shockley’s model, Liu’s liquidity-augmented model and Petkova’s model as competing models. The results are different with 25 size- and B/M- sorted returns and 12 industry returns. When using 25 portfolio returns, the result has the pattern that the later proposed model has the better ability to explain the variation on returns. While the 12 industry returns is used, Liu’s liquidityaugmented model tends to be the worst model to fit the returns. Pin-Huang Chou 周賓凰 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 40 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融研究所 === 97 === Many asset pricing models have been proposed to fit the asset returns in the literature, but few studies discuss the relative performance between them. Non-nested model specification tests provide the econometric tools to compare the performance of many models. Of many asset pricing models, we choose popular Fama-French three factor model, Ferguson and Shockley’s model, Liu’s liquidity-augmented model and Petkova’s model as competing models. The results are different with 25 size- and B/M- sorted returns and 12 industry returns. When using 25 portfolio returns, the result has the pattern that the later proposed model has the better ability to explain the variation on returns. While the 12 industry returns is used, Liu’s liquidityaugmented model tends to be the worst model to fit the returns.
author2 Pin-Huang Chou
author_facet Pin-Huang Chou
Jin-pon Huang
黃進鵬
author Jin-pon Huang
黃進鵬
spellingShingle Jin-pon Huang
黃進鵬
Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
author_sort Jin-pon Huang
title Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
title_short Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
title_full Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
title_fullStr Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
title_full_unstemmed Non-nested Tests of Asset Pricing Models
title_sort non-nested tests of asset pricing models
publishDate 2009
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/v47488
work_keys_str_mv AT jinponhuang nonnestedtestsofassetpricingmodels
AT huángjìnpéng nonnestedtestsofassetpricingmodels
AT jinponhuang zīchǎndìngjiàmóxíngdefēicháoshìjiǎndìng
AT huángjìnpéng zīchǎndìngjiàmóxíngdefēicháoshìjiǎndìng
_version_ 1719099617876901888