| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 國家政策與公共事務研究所 === 97 === The goal of this study is to explore the views of Civil Service Ethics (CSE) staff on the Integrity Evaluation System (IES) of governments of various levels. The study discover：
(A) 93% respondents agree to incorporate input indices into the government IES. Most effective input indices to reflect government integrity are: number of CSE personnel, budget of CSE per person and growth rate of CSE budget in individual government organizations. On the other hand, the execution percentage is considered the most ineffective input index to reflect the degree of government integrity.
(B) 97% respondents agree to incorporate process indices into the government IES. Most effective process indices to reflect government integrity are: percentage of public bidding of government procurement, well registration and filing of lobby, bribery and social banquet, and the average number of audited cases per CSE person. On the other hand, the audit of processing speed of official documents, the average hours of anti-corruption training per CSE person and execution status of county head’s e-mail messages are considered the most ineffective process indices to reflect the degree of government integrity.
(C) 96% respondents agree to incorporate output indices into the government IES. Most effective output indices to reflect government integrity are: number of corruption cases in government organizations, number of CSE cases brought by named people and number of corrupting people in government organizations. On the other hand, the number of appeals filed by bidders in government procurement cases, the number of cases of untruthful report of personal property by government officials, and the sum of corruption money in government organizations are considered the most ineffective output indices to reflect the degree of government integrity.
(D) 93% respondents agree to incorporate influence indices into the government IES. Most effective influence indices to reflect government integrity are: the estimate by organization employees on the weight of integrity placed by the organization head, the estimate by people on the integrity of government organization heads, the estimate by people on the integrity of government employees. On the other hand, the number of cases with negative service attitude, the number of positive and negative news about CSE reported by the four major newspapers, and the number of good attitude of service brought by people are considered the most ineffective influence indices to reflect the degree of government integrity.
Based on the results of above analysis, the following suggestions are made: (A) Closely follow the budget during the practice of CSE business. (B) Enhance practice efficiency and relevant training, pay attention to the messages in County head’s e-mail box constantly. (C) Enhance audit essentials of property-declare personnel. (D) Enhance service training of government personnel and announce positive image of government organizations.
|
|---|
