Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 應用數學研究所 === 97 === Fong and Vasicek (1997) mentioned that risk analysis should include sensitivity analysis, value at risk (VaR) and stress testing, in order to capture portfolio risk. The calculation of VaR should not only consider the second moment but should also adjust the skew...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2009
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30528510634484756871 |
id |
ndltd-TW-097NCCU5507019 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-097NCCU55070192015-11-20T04:18:48Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30528510634484756871 Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research 多維風險分析-實證研究 Su,Ailing 蘇愛鈴 碩士 國立政治大學 應用數學研究所 97 Fong and Vasicek (1997) mentioned that risk analysis should include sensitivity analysis, value at risk (VaR) and stress testing, in order to capture portfolio risk. The calculation of VaR should not only consider the second moment but should also adjust the skewness using the third moment. In this article, we determine VaR by employing three methods, the variance covariance, the historical simulation and the Monte Carlo simulation methods. In addition, we also adjust VaR for the skewness and kurtosis using the methods developed by Fong and Vasicek (1997) and Cornish-Fisher. Then, the likelihood ratio test, back testing and the Z-test are used to verify the VaR model. Our final test results suggest that calculating VaR should be adjusted for the skewness and the kurtosis as shown by the method proposed by Cornish Fisher in the 95% and 99% confidence intervals. 陳松男 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 52 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 應用數學研究所 === 97 === Fong and Vasicek (1997) mentioned that risk analysis should include sensitivity analysis, value at risk (VaR) and stress testing, in order to capture portfolio risk. The calculation of VaR should not only consider the second moment but should also adjust the skewness using the third moment. In this article, we determine VaR by employing three methods, the variance covariance, the historical simulation and the Monte Carlo simulation methods. In addition, we also adjust VaR for the skewness and kurtosis using the methods developed by Fong and Vasicek (1997) and Cornish-Fisher. Then, the likelihood ratio test, back testing and the Z-test are used to verify the VaR model. Our final test results suggest that calculating VaR should be adjusted for the skewness and the kurtosis as shown by the method proposed by Cornish Fisher in the 95% and 99% confidence intervals.
|
author2 |
陳松男 |
author_facet |
陳松男 Su,Ailing 蘇愛鈴 |
author |
Su,Ailing 蘇愛鈴 |
spellingShingle |
Su,Ailing 蘇愛鈴 Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
author_sort |
Su,Ailing |
title |
Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
title_short |
Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
title_full |
Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
title_fullStr |
Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
title_sort |
multidimensional risk analysis-demonstration research |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30528510634484756871 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suailing multidimensionalriskanalysisdemonstrationresearch AT sūàilíng multidimensionalriskanalysisdemonstrationresearch AT suailing duōwéifēngxiǎnfēnxīshízhèngyánjiū AT sūàilíng duōwéifēngxiǎnfēnxīshízhèngyánjiū |
_version_ |
1718132606343577600 |