政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 97 === The study provides insights into the additionality of government subsidy on firms’ innovation activities. Previous research has focused on the relationship between government funding and private R&D input and output, but no consensus were made. Using a sample...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 趙鈞浩
Other Authors: 許牧彥
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81946669623518261461
id ndltd-TW-097NCCU5230031
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-097NCCU52300312015-11-20T04:19:11Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81946669623518261461 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析 趙鈞浩 碩士 國立政治大學 科技管理研究所 97 The study provides insights into the additionality of government subsidy on firms’ innovation activities. Previous research has focused on the relationship between government funding and private R&D input and output, but no consensus were made. Using a sample of 581 observations in the database of Taiwan Technology Innovation SurveyⅡ, the study contains a two-stage analysis. First, the Probit regression model is used, and the dependent variable is "whether a firm gaining government subsidy in 2008-2009 or not". The explanatory variables include firm size, innovation capacity, technology sources and subsidy history. In the second stage, we used the counterfactual scenario about what could happen if there existed no government-sponsored programs intervention. Firms could choose from four alternatives:1. Abandoning innovative activities. 2. Choosing projects which contain lower risk. 3. Downsizing the scale of capital and 4.Keeping the same project. If firms choose the first one, then the additionality of government subsidy is the highest. If firms choose the second or the third one, then the additionality is in the middle. If firms choose the fourth one, then the additionality is the lowest. In this stage, the Multi-variate Probit model is used. The empirical results show that there is a significant positive correlation between firm size and gaining government subsidy, and a significant negative correlation between outsourcing R&D and gaining government subsidy. In the second stage, we find that subsidy toward the firms which "outsourcing R&D and "purchasing machines" have the highest additionality. Besides, subsidy toward firms which received subsidy in 2004-2006 has median additionality. 許牧彥 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 76 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 科技管理研究所 === 97 === The study provides insights into the additionality of government subsidy on firms’ innovation activities. Previous research has focused on the relationship between government funding and private R&D input and output, but no consensus were made. Using a sample of 581 observations in the database of Taiwan Technology Innovation SurveyⅡ, the study contains a two-stage analysis. First, the Probit regression model is used, and the dependent variable is "whether a firm gaining government subsidy in 2008-2009 or not". The explanatory variables include firm size, innovation capacity, technology sources and subsidy history. In the second stage, we used the counterfactual scenario about what could happen if there existed no government-sponsored programs intervention. Firms could choose from four alternatives:1. Abandoning innovative activities. 2. Choosing projects which contain lower risk. 3. Downsizing the scale of capital and 4.Keeping the same project. If firms choose the first one, then the additionality of government subsidy is the highest. If firms choose the second or the third one, then the additionality is in the middle. If firms choose the fourth one, then the additionality is the lowest. In this stage, the Multi-variate Probit model is used. The empirical results show that there is a significant positive correlation between firm size and gaining government subsidy, and a significant negative correlation between outsourcing R&D and gaining government subsidy. In the second stage, we find that subsidy toward the firms which "outsourcing R&D and "purchasing machines" have the highest additionality. Besides, subsidy toward firms which received subsidy in 2004-2006 has median additionality.
author2 許牧彥
author_facet 許牧彥
趙鈞浩
author 趙鈞浩
spellingShingle 趙鈞浩
政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
author_sort 趙鈞浩
title 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
title_short 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
title_full 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
title_fullStr 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
title_full_unstemmed 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
title_sort 政府資助廠商創新政策之附加性研究-台灣製造業之實證分析
publishDate 2009
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81946669623518261461
work_keys_str_mv AT zhàojūnhào zhèngfǔzīzhùchǎngshāngchuàngxīnzhèngcèzhīfùjiāxìngyánjiūtáiwānzhìzàoyèzhīshízhèngfēnxī
_version_ 1718132413773643776