Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials

碩士 === 大葉大學 === 應用外語研究所 === 97 === This study aimed to investigate the effect of annotations and advance organizers on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. A 3×3 between-subject factorial design is used. Under the CALL setting, two independent variables are involved: annot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Hsuan Lin, 林旻璇
Other Authors: Syou Rung Tsau
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81897489473802522327
id ndltd-TW-097DYU00615001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-097DYU006150012015-10-13T13:08:49Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81897489473802522327 Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials 前導組體及單字註解在線上閱讀理解課程之整合應用 Min Hsuan Lin 林旻璇 碩士 大葉大學 應用外語研究所 97 This study aimed to investigate the effect of annotations and advance organizers on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. A 3×3 between-subject factorial design is used. Under the CALL setting, two independent variables are involved: annotations (online dictionary, margin and pop-up) and advance organizers (none, descriptive and question). Seventy two English-majored students, based on their English scores, were systematically assigned to nine groups. The instruments used for data collection were vocabulary tests (word recognition and application), reading comprehension tests (literal comprehension, interpretive comprehension) and questionnaires. To answer the research questions, two-way analysis of variance and the goodness of fit test were conducted. It is found that students in the margin annotation and the pop-up annotation group outperformed the online dictionary group in vocabulary tests but not in the reading comprehension test. This result suggested that EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition was facilitated by margin and pop-up annotations more than by an online dictionary. However, when compared with an online dictionary, annotation did not enhance students’ reading comprehension. Furthermore, there was no significant difference among none, descriptive and question advance organizer groups regarding their reading comprehension. The results indicated that reading comprehension might be hindered by advance organizers. Nevertheless, most of the students hold positive attitudes toward the use of web-based instruction (online annotations and advance organizers) for vocabulary acquisition and article comprehension. Based on the findings, some pedagogical implications and design of web-based annotations and advance organizers were derived for future relevant studies of second language learning and strategy. Syou Rung Tsau 曹秀蓉 2009 學位論文 ; thesis 152 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 大葉大學 === 應用外語研究所 === 97 === This study aimed to investigate the effect of annotations and advance organizers on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. A 3×3 between-subject factorial design is used. Under the CALL setting, two independent variables are involved: annotations (online dictionary, margin and pop-up) and advance organizers (none, descriptive and question). Seventy two English-majored students, based on their English scores, were systematically assigned to nine groups. The instruments used for data collection were vocabulary tests (word recognition and application), reading comprehension tests (literal comprehension, interpretive comprehension) and questionnaires. To answer the research questions, two-way analysis of variance and the goodness of fit test were conducted. It is found that students in the margin annotation and the pop-up annotation group outperformed the online dictionary group in vocabulary tests but not in the reading comprehension test. This result suggested that EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition was facilitated by margin and pop-up annotations more than by an online dictionary. However, when compared with an online dictionary, annotation did not enhance students’ reading comprehension. Furthermore, there was no significant difference among none, descriptive and question advance organizer groups regarding their reading comprehension. The results indicated that reading comprehension might be hindered by advance organizers. Nevertheless, most of the students hold positive attitudes toward the use of web-based instruction (online annotations and advance organizers) for vocabulary acquisition and article comprehension. Based on the findings, some pedagogical implications and design of web-based annotations and advance organizers were derived for future relevant studies of second language learning and strategy.
author2 Syou Rung Tsau
author_facet Syou Rung Tsau
Min Hsuan Lin
林旻璇
author Min Hsuan Lin
林旻璇
spellingShingle Min Hsuan Lin
林旻璇
Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials
author_sort Min Hsuan Lin
title Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials
title_short Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials
title_full Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials
title_fullStr Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials
title_full_unstemmed Incorporation of Advance Organizers and Annotations in Online Reading Comprehension Tutorials
title_sort incorporation of advance organizers and annotations in online reading comprehension tutorials
publishDate 2009
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81897489473802522327
work_keys_str_mv AT minhsuanlin incorporationofadvanceorganizersandannotationsinonlinereadingcomprehensiontutorials
AT línmínxuán incorporationofadvanceorganizersandannotationsinonlinereadingcomprehensiontutorials
AT minhsuanlin qiándǎozǔtǐjídānzìzhùjiězàixiànshàngyuèdúlǐjiěkèchéngzhīzhěnghéyīngyòng
AT línmínxuán qiándǎozǔtǐjídānzìzhùjiězàixiànshàngyuèdúlǐjiěkèchéngzhīzhěnghéyīngyòng
_version_ 1717733177206767616