The Research of the Difference between Self-evaluated and Superior Performance Appraisal－A Case Study of the Civil Servant in Ministry of Economic Affairs

• Main Authors: Yu-Shiuan Tai, 戴宇軒
• Other Authors: Te-Hsiu Sun
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2009
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/64947853781908873136

碩士 === 朝陽科技大學 === 工業工程與管理系碩士班 === 97 === Abstract The research mainly confers the differences between the self-evaluated and the superior performance appraisal of the civil servants in Ministry of Economic Affairs. Seven experts have individually been chosen from the superintendents and staff members that have worked for more than three years in Ministry of Economic Affairs. According to the data collected/analyzed and the survey of professional questionnaire by interviewing with the seven experts, we try to find out every cause of the core and effective methods to provide the government organizations to improve the administration effects for consulting. Among them, the survey of professional questionnaire in Delphi method has proceeded the interview two times by being reported back. With the result of the research, we can bring up the meanings of the management below： I. Regardless of effection evaluating or evaluated men, they are effected individually and mutually by personality characters, motives of psychology, and attitudes of action, and are causing the errors of evaluation. and the differences of perception. II. Because The relationship of a crowd was effected by our individual culture－ a concept of authority, so it would be obstructing some of connections for work and making differences to staffs’works and effects by a director who was believing in. III. Because it was effected by the causes of situation, so the effects for work would be difficult arriving at by more unfavorable causes of situation and it would result in the differences between expressions and contributions. IV. Because the evaluation system was not conforming to the theories of function, correctness, tact and right of distribution, so directors would be evaluating by the regulations now and self-considered and it would be causing some of staffs which have the differences of reception for evaluation.