The Effect of Evaluation Indicators of cardiopulmonary and Fat Oxidation by Different Running Training Methods

碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 運動與休閒教育所 === 97 === Purpose: The objective of this study is to explore the effect of different running methods to cardiopulmonary evaluation indicators which included maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), the velocity at VO2max (vVO2max), ventilatory threshold (VT), exercise exhaustion t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chun-Yi Liao, 廖俊易
Other Authors: Soun-Cheng Wang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/77531804008288766107
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 運動與休閒教育所 === 97 === Purpose: The objective of this study is to explore the effect of different running methods to cardiopulmonary evaluation indicators which included maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), the velocity at VO2max (vVO2max), ventilatory threshold (VT), exercise exhaustion time, and fat oxidation which included maximal fat oxidation rate (FATmax Rate), maximal fat oxidation (FATmax). Method: 32 healthy college students as subjects (age 21.72±1.57 yrs, height 167.75±8.80 cm, weight 62.16±11.00 kg). Physiological responses were recorded from the maximal effort exercise of incremental load accepted by participants who were equally distribution of load into HIIT group (12 participants), aerobic training group (10 participants) and control group (10 participants). Participants of 90% VO2max intensity of HIIT group accepted 6 stages each time and the duration was two minutes, one minute of stance relaxation among stages. Participants of 65% VO2max intensity of running training group accepted aerobic endurance training continuously for thirty minutes. Control group did not receive any training. Participants of training groups accepted training running for six weeks and three times a week. All participants accepted the maximal effort exercise of incremental load at the third and sixth week. Data was analyzed with ANCOVA as the material of evaluation of correlation between different training and cardiopulmonary evaluation indicators, FATmax Rate and FATmax. Results: There was significant differences between 90% VO2max intensity of HIIT group, VO2max (before:46.27±8.43 ml/min/kg、after:48.37±7.48 ml/min/kg), exercise exhaustion time (before:15.31±4.10 min、after:18.07±3.73 min), aerobic training group (before:48.18±9.18 ml/min/kg、after:47.53±8.77 ml/min/kg;before:16.22±4.12 min、after:17.83±4.75 min) and control group (before:44.49±8.61 ml/min/kg、after:43.94±6.57 ml/min/kg;before:16.35±4.74 min、after:16.70±4.29 min) (p <.05). after three week of training. There was significant differences between 90% VO2max intensity of HIIT group, VO2max (47.37±7.15 ml/min/kg), vVO2max (12.53±1.63 km/hr), exercise exhaustion time (19.08±3.86 min), aerobic training group (46.76±8.35 ml/min/kg、12.01±1.62 km/hr、18.27±4.78 min) and control group (43.67±7.63 ml/min/kg、11.77±1.77 km/hr、17.00±4.28 min) (p <.05) after six weeks of training. There was no significant differences between FATmax and FATmax rate after three and six weeks of training (p >.05). Conclutions: Only three weeks and six weeks of training 90% VO2max intensity of HIIT improved effectively over cardiopulmonary evaluation index and the training efficacy surpassed in 65% VO2max intensity of running training. However, there were no significant efficacy to FATmax Rate and FATmax .