A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === This paper adopts the GARCH jump model and ARJI model of Chan and Maheu(2002) that combine the skewed generalized error distribution of asset returns, in order to examine the jump, leptokurtosis and volatility clustering for the rates of returns of America and...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2008
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/85563055978979441558 |
id |
ndltd-TW-096TKU05214002 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-096TKU052140022016-05-18T04:13:36Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/85563055978979441558 A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns 資產報酬在偏態GED分配下之跳躍模型比較 Chun-Chi Chen 陳俊吉 碩士 淡江大學 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 96 This paper adopts the GARCH jump model and ARJI model of Chan and Maheu(2002) that combine the skewed generalized error distribution of asset returns, in order to examine the jump, leptokurtosis and volatility clustering for the rates of returns of America and BRICs. We also employ likelihood ratio test for testing goodness of different models. In conclusion, we analyze different models’ capture ability for statistic features of mature market and emerging markets. The empirical results indicated that the five countries exist heavy tail and volatility clustering, but GARCH-JD and ARJI model with Russia and GARCH-JD with China can’t capture skewness. We also find these countries’ stock returns except Brazil with the two models have significant characteristic of jumping and jump process is provided with time varying. It’s better efficient when we assume that asset returns obey SGED. The ARJI model with SGED of asset returns develop that the diminishing efficiency for mature markets is faster then emerging markets while the earlier stage’s returns affect it at present. But mature markets’ nonpredictive volatility in early days for effecting upon at once is stronger then emerging markets. In the end, the likelihood ratio test demonstrate that these countries using SGED have more significant goodness of fit then using normal distribution. Totally, the ARJI model captures statistical property’s ability surpasses the GARCH-JD model and the ARJI model utilizes to the emerging markets compared with utilizes has the better explanation ability to the mature market. Ming-Chih Lee 李命志 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 59 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === This paper adopts the GARCH jump model and ARJI model of Chan and Maheu(2002) that combine the skewed generalized error distribution of asset returns, in order to examine the jump, leptokurtosis and volatility clustering for the rates of returns of America and BRICs. We also employ likelihood ratio test for testing goodness of different models. In conclusion, we analyze different models’ capture ability for statistic features of mature market and emerging markets.
The empirical results indicated that the five countries exist heavy tail and volatility clustering, but GARCH-JD and ARJI model with Russia and GARCH-JD with China can’t capture skewness. We also find these countries’ stock returns except Brazil with the two models have significant characteristic of jumping and jump process is provided with time varying. It’s better efficient when we assume that asset returns obey SGED. The ARJI model with SGED of asset returns develop that the diminishing efficiency for mature markets is faster then emerging markets while the earlier stage’s returns affect it at present. But mature markets’ nonpredictive volatility in early days for effecting upon at once is stronger then emerging markets. In the end, the likelihood ratio test demonstrate that these countries using SGED have more significant goodness of fit then using normal distribution. Totally, the ARJI model captures statistical property’s ability surpasses the GARCH-JD model and the ARJI model utilizes to the emerging markets compared with utilizes has the better explanation ability to the mature market.
|
author2 |
Ming-Chih Lee |
author_facet |
Ming-Chih Lee Chun-Chi Chen 陳俊吉 |
author |
Chun-Chi Chen 陳俊吉 |
spellingShingle |
Chun-Chi Chen 陳俊吉 A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns |
author_sort |
Chun-Chi Chen |
title |
A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns |
title_short |
A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns |
title_full |
A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of GARCH –Jump Models with Skewed Generalized Error Distribution for Asset Returns |
title_sort |
comparison of garch –jump models with skewed generalized error distribution for asset returns |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/85563055978979441558 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chunchichen acomparisonofgarchjumpmodelswithskewedgeneralizederrordistributionforassetreturns AT chénjùnjí acomparisonofgarchjumpmodelswithskewedgeneralizederrordistributionforassetreturns AT chunchichen zīchǎnbàochóuzàipiāntàigedfēnpèixiàzhītiàoyuèmóxíngbǐjiào AT chénjùnjí zīchǎnbàochóuzàipiāntàigedfēnpèixiàzhītiàoyuèmóxíngbǐjiào AT chunchichen comparisonofgarchjumpmodelswithskewedgeneralizederrordistributionforassetreturns AT chénjùnjí comparisonofgarchjumpmodelswithskewedgeneralizederrordistributionforassetreturns |
_version_ |
1718271499724390400 |