Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === This study used the metaphor of animal ecology to build the conceptual models for the managers’ Personality in leadership and organization fitness. It takes organizational structure and organization culture as the ecological environment on the inside of an org...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hsiang-Ping Chang, 張湘萍
Other Authors: 王居卿
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/61889983430223382589
id ndltd-TW-096TKU05121033
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096TKU051210332015-10-13T13:47:53Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/61889983430223382589 Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology 管理者領導特質與組織之適配性探討--動物生態隱喻法 Hsiang-Ping Chang 張湘萍 碩士 淡江大學 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 96 This study used the metaphor of animal ecology to build the conceptual models for the managers’ Personality in leadership and organization fitness. It takes organizational structure and organization culture as the ecological environment on the inside of an organization through animal ecological theory. This study tries to find the best fitness among manager’s personality traits, organization culture and organizational structure; that is to say, it discusses that the manager of each level how to survive in the ecological environment. The personality traits of manager can be grouped into several types - tiger, peacock, koalas, owl, and chameleon by the PDP (Professional Dynametric Programs). Organization culture is sorted to be three classifications - hureaucracy, innovation and support. Organizational structure is divided into several levels - top, middle, first-line level and employee. In this research, we collect extensive literature in according to the qualitative way and then exploring the fitness between managers’ personality in leadership and organization with the concept of the five elements by analogy. 1.When it talks about the managers’ Personality in leadership fitness from each level in an organization, the relationship between leader ad employees should find each other’s complementarity, but not the same personality. 2.The strength of manager’s personality will have influence on the fitness between manager and organization. 3.The portfolio of the best fitness between organization culture and managers’ personality in leadership is as following: (1)Innovative culture -tiger and chameleon. (2)Supportive culture - peacock. (3)Bureaucratic culture - koalas and owl. 4.The portfolio of the worst fitness between organization culture and managers’ personality in leadership is as following: (1)Bureaucratic culture - top and middle management who belong to tiger style. (2)Bureaucratic culture - top and middle management who belong to peacock style. (3)Innovative and supportive culture - top management who belong to owl style. (4)Innovative and supportive culture – top management who belong to koalas style. 5.When management try to survive in organization, the way to lead employees will make a big difference by individual character. (1)Management who is tiger style will take beneficial way to themselves. (2)Management who is peacock style will take good relationship as first choice. (3)Management who is koalas style will lead employees by their authority power. (4)Management who is owl style will use precise analysis to lead people as their leadership style. (5)Management who is chameleon style will lead followers through the adapter of organization culture. 王居卿 楊立人 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 96 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === This study used the metaphor of animal ecology to build the conceptual models for the managers’ Personality in leadership and organization fitness. It takes organizational structure and organization culture as the ecological environment on the inside of an organization through animal ecological theory. This study tries to find the best fitness among manager’s personality traits, organization culture and organizational structure; that is to say, it discusses that the manager of each level how to survive in the ecological environment. The personality traits of manager can be grouped into several types - tiger, peacock, koalas, owl, and chameleon by the PDP (Professional Dynametric Programs). Organization culture is sorted to be three classifications - hureaucracy, innovation and support. Organizational structure is divided into several levels - top, middle, first-line level and employee. In this research, we collect extensive literature in according to the qualitative way and then exploring the fitness between managers’ personality in leadership and organization with the concept of the five elements by analogy. 1.When it talks about the managers’ Personality in leadership fitness from each level in an organization, the relationship between leader ad employees should find each other’s complementarity, but not the same personality. 2.The strength of manager’s personality will have influence on the fitness between manager and organization. 3.The portfolio of the best fitness between organization culture and managers’ personality in leadership is as following: (1)Innovative culture -tiger and chameleon. (2)Supportive culture - peacock. (3)Bureaucratic culture - koalas and owl. 4.The portfolio of the worst fitness between organization culture and managers’ personality in leadership is as following: (1)Bureaucratic culture - top and middle management who belong to tiger style. (2)Bureaucratic culture - top and middle management who belong to peacock style. (3)Innovative and supportive culture - top management who belong to owl style. (4)Innovative and supportive culture – top management who belong to koalas style. 5.When management try to survive in organization, the way to lead employees will make a big difference by individual character. (1)Management who is tiger style will take beneficial way to themselves. (2)Management who is peacock style will take good relationship as first choice. (3)Management who is koalas style will lead employees by their authority power. (4)Management who is owl style will use precise analysis to lead people as their leadership style. (5)Management who is chameleon style will lead followers through the adapter of organization culture.
author2 王居卿
author_facet 王居卿
Hsiang-Ping Chang
張湘萍
author Hsiang-Ping Chang
張湘萍
spellingShingle Hsiang-Ping Chang
張湘萍
Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology
author_sort Hsiang-Ping Chang
title Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology
title_short Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology
title_full Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology
title_fullStr Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Fitness between Managers'' Personality in Leadership and Organization: Metaphor of Animal Ecology
title_sort exploring the fitness between managers'' personality in leadership and organization: metaphor of animal ecology
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/61889983430223382589
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiangpingchang exploringthefitnessbetweenmanagerspersonalityinleadershipandorganizationmetaphorofanimalecology
AT zhāngxiāngpíng exploringthefitnessbetweenmanagerspersonalityinleadershipandorganizationmetaphorofanimalecology
AT hsiangpingchang guǎnlǐzhělǐngdǎotèzhìyǔzǔzhīzhīshìpèixìngtàntǎodòngwùshēngtàiyǐnyùfǎ
AT zhāngxiāngpíng guǎnlǐzhělǐngdǎotèzhìyǔzǔzhīzhīshìpèixìngtàntǎodòngwùshēngtàiyǐnyùfǎ
_version_ 1717743277220823040